Solved: As far as I know, Cisco's

Docklands · ‎01-04-2017

If two switches are linked together by two pairs of fibres which are varying in length (3.5km & 8.6km), can the links be aggregated?

Joseph W. Doherty · ‎01-17-2017

As far as I know, Cisco's Etherchannel doesn't split what it considers to be the same flow's frames or packets across links, so there's nothing that needs to be put back together at the other end.

This does mean, that the frames or packets, from different flows, can have their arrival sequence changed as they cross an Etherchannel.

View solution in original post

timothy.harder1 · ‎01-05-2017

I don't see a problem with that at all,

Are you having issues doing so?

-Tim

Docklands · ‎01-05-2017

Hi Tim,

We are only at the design stage. I was wondering whether we would experience issues with the varying time delays caused by the differents lengths when it comes to putting it back together the other end?

Mike

Joseph W. Doherty · ‎01-17-2017

As far as I know, Cisco's Etherchannel doesn't split what it considers to be the same flow's frames or packets across links, so there's nothing that needs to be put back together at the other end.

This does mean, that the frames or packets, from different flows, can have their arrival sequence changed as they cross an Etherchannel.

Docklands · ‎02-07-2017

Thank you Joseph. Sorry for the delay I've been on extended leave.

Link Aggregation