cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1582
Views
10
Helpful
5
Replies

ACL for BGP?

louis0001
Level 3
Level 3

I'm just implementing ZBF on a router and trying to secure the SELF zone.

Our router peers to the ISP 's PE router on a /30.

Should we just allow the PE router eg host 1.2.3.4 eq BGP or allow the the BGP subnet 1.2.3.0/24 eq bgp?

5 Replies 5

Hello

I would say be a specific as possible if you can.


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

balaji.bandi
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

If you like to work ZBF for the BGP, thinking that Router behind ZBF. ( i would suggest to allow only required IP rather /24 - for security reason)

 

here is good example :

 

https://www.802101.com/ccie-security-zone-based-firewalls/

 

 

 

 

 

 

BB

***** Rate All Helpful Responses *****

How to Ask The Cisco Community for Help

Giuseppe Larosa
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hello @louis0001 ,

just to add a side note about ACLs and BGP: the well known BGP port TCP 179 is used on one side so I would permit traffic from host PE router address with destination port BGP AND traffic from host PE address source port BGP using two statements.

 

Hope to help

Giuseppe

 

Thank you. I was thinking of two statements because I'm still not sure if inspect works on the self zone so was going to use the pass statement.

Thanks for the help.

Sure 2 statement good to go, if you are not sure inspect works or not. make the necessary changes and see if the BGP come up or not ( personally i would go with inspect).

 

if no BGP peer add inspect commands.

BB

***** Rate All Helpful Responses *****

How to Ask The Cisco Community for Help