Routing

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Labels

Forum Posts

Hoping to find a better solution with the implementation of Route-Maps, any advice will be appreciated Here is the scenarioI am running Cisco 887VAG routers, which gives you an ADSL connection & a Cellular (3G) connection.In my scenario the ADSL conn...

NeilGouws by Level 1
  • 4292 Views
  • 11 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Why do we hear ringing/IVR when we hear RTP in wireshark from SIP traces when RTP is supposed to be established after 200 OK followed by ACK and all these things happen before ACK? I think the only thing which should be in RTP is the conversation whi...

I'm having these strange network latency, crawling speed issues on a couple of Dell R610 servers I have. I have multiple other R610's with same specs, connected to the same Cisco 3750 switch and they're fine. I've done a lot of troubleshooting and st...

Here is the network otherRouter-SiteArouter -- {Provider Allstream Switched Ethernet) -- SiteBrouter                              |                        router(10.96.20.16, which has 10.1.44.1/24 interface)    Gi0/0 is Switched Ethernet interface f...

Ryan Tian by Level 1
  • 9836 Views
  • 22 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi everyone! I have this setup in my MPLS VPN cloud but it's giving me 'peer in wrong AS' errors between router R3 and R4. Some help needed because i can't get it right. I want iBGP peering between router 2 and 3 and eBGP peering between R1 and 2 + b...

Hello, My Company has a public pool of IPv4 addresses, that we would like to announce via our ISP and use for the DMZ-environment for general Internet access from inside, as well as reverse proxy services. The present design has these services imple...

otc100001 by Level 1
  • 346 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I'm seeing packet loss on some UDP jitter monitors that I recently configured.  The monitors are setup with a ToS of 184 and voice codec to simulate voice traffic conditions.  I asked the ISP to check into the packet loss and they're dumbfounded that...

There are 2 paths to destination in an OSPF network. Both paths have equal total path cost. So by default OSPF takes both paths to its routing table. "maximum-paths 1" command is given after that and as its effects only one path is now in the routing...