- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-12-2012 11:28 AM - edited 03-04-2019 03:14 PM
Hi,
<RouterID 10.10.10.1>----eBGP----<RouterID 10.10.1.1>---adding new subnet 10.10.1.2
In case if we add new subnet like 10.10.1.2 into bgp using network command should we do clear ip bgp x.x.x.x?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Routing Protocols
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-13-2012 03:12 AM
Hi,
if you modify a policy then you must do either a soft reset or a route-refresh( with clear ip bgp x.x.x.x in or clear ip bgp x.x.x.x out).
Regards.
Alain
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-12-2012 11:32 AM
Hi,
No need. Just make sure that the new "network" you added is already in RIB.
HTH,
Toshi
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-12-2012 11:34 AM
Hi,
no it isn't and as a side note as most routers support route refresh you should be better doing a clear ip bgp x.x.x.x in or
clear ip bgp x.x.x.x out which are soft resets which don't tear the peering.
Regards.
Alain.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-12-2012 11:22 PM
I'm not able to find subnetwork 10.10.1.20/30 with command below:
10.10.10.1> sh ip bgp neigh 10.10.1.2 routes
Also this command doesn't show route 10.10.1.20/30
10.10.1.1> sh ip bgp neigh 10.10.1.2 advertised-routes
Can see 10.10.1.20/30 in below
10.10.1.1>sh ip bgp
Can't see 10.10.1.20/30 in below
10.10.10.1>sh ip bgp
What should I within clear ip bgp? or any other usefull command? Any glue?
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-12-2012 11:34 PM
clear ip bgp is not mandatory the only the important thing is the mask in the network statment and in the routing table should be same.
syed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-12-2012 11:40 PM
Hi,
aren't you filtering the prefixes advertised to 10.10.1.2?
Outgoing route-map, filter-list, etc.?
You could try
clear ip bgp 10.10.1.2 soft
but it should not be necessary if the 10.10.1.20/30 was in the RIB at the moment you added
network 10.10.1.20 mask 255.255.255.252
to you BGP config.
Another low probability chance:
Aren't you receiving the same prefix from 10.10.1.2 already with better BGP attributes?
In that way you would not advertise the prefix back.
Or isn't the prefix next-hop pointing to 10.10.1.2?
HTH,
Milan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-13-2012 02:54 AM
10.10.1.20 is directly connected network on RouterID 10.10.1.1
I don't think that I should add this route into IGP, as we use eBGP between RouterID 10.10.1.1 and RouterID 10.10.10.1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-13-2012 03:01 AM
If we modify policy - should we do clear ip bgp soft?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-13-2012 03:12 AM
Hi,
if you modify a policy then you must do either a soft reset or a route-refresh( with clear ip bgp x.x.x.x in or clear ip bgp x.x.x.x out).
Regards.
Alain
