ā06-29-2012 02:20 AM - edited ā03-04-2019 04:50 PM
Hello All,
I have 2 links from thesame isp. So segments are divided between the links and advertise using prefix-list for restriction
Now one of the link is having issues, so i decided to send all the traffic on the other link, but i realise that since there is no restriction the faulty link while the bgp is still up, all the segments inside the bgp session are advertise there because BGP is still up, now looking like there is a look, i thought of using advertise map at the level of the neighbor but recieve only a BGP default route from my upstream.
I cant shut BGP down because my neighbor ip addresss comes through BGP and my IPSEC GRE tunnels use this ip address
What else can i use in other to restrict this
Regards
ā07-02-2012 10:15 PM
Hi,
Match the default route with AS-Path access-list, it will work.
ip as-path access-list 2 permit ^
ip prefix-list DEFROUTE seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0
route-map NON-EXISTTYP permit 10
match ip address prefix-list DEFROUTE
match as-path 2
HTH,
Smitesh
PS: Please rate helpful posts...
ā07-03-2012 01:28 AM
just to complete the solution suggested by smitesh ,
apply the route map NON-EXISTTYP in neighboor : neigboor <@IP> route-map NON-EXISTTYP in
ā07-03-2012 01:40 AM
If i use
ip prefix-list DEFROUTE seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0
Wont all the prefix be allowed through, i believe 0.0.0.0/0 means anything??
Regards
ā07-03-2012 02:06 AM
Hi,
It will match all, however since you want to have conditional advertisement, even in case your primary link goes down, you will receive default via your secondary link and Access-list will still match. Hence, match default route in conditional advertisement is not a good option; unless you are receiving two default set of IP prefixes from both ISPs.
HTH,
Smitesh
ā07-03-2012 02:33 AM
Hi,
IMHO,
ip prefix-list DEFROUTE seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0
matches only the deafult route.
If you want to match all prefixes, you would need to add
ip prefix-list DEFROUTE seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32
But generally , I'm missing your idea here: What do you want to achieve?
BR,
Milan
ā07-03-2012 02:04 AM
Hi Adnane,
I beg to differ here, since this scenario we are doing conditional route-advertisement, we will use advertise-map instead of route-map as you suggested.
HTH,
Smitesh
ā07-03-2012 02:11 AM
Am getting something, tell me now that i recieve only a default BGP route from my upstream provider inside my bgp table
How will this works, since i need this routes inside my bgp routing table
Regards
ā07-03-2012 02:38 AM
it's better to post schema architecture with more clarifications , that will help us to converge toward right way
ā07-03-2012 03:19 AM
Attached above the schema of my case.
Regards
ā07-03-2012 03:59 AM
For problem 1 : us I understand you don't want to take any route from link , to do so just create a prefix list and apply it to incoming route in link 1
ip prefix-list myprefix deny 0.0.0.0/0
neighbor @IP prefix-list mypref in
and apply command : clear ip bgp * soft
compare th result of two commands : show ip bgp neighbors @IP received-routes and show ip bgp @IP routes , it show yuo if your filter is working .
for Problem 2 I send you my solution soon
ā07-06-2012 12:20 AM
Tell me, can i influence BGP returning traffic, when i receive only a B* route from my upstream provider?
Regards
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide