02-17-2011 03:00 AM - edited 03-04-2019 11:27 AM
Hi everyone,
I have an issue with PPTP tunnels behind a 7201 router which does NAT Overloading for inside LAN hosts.
Users in LAN are unable to establish outgoing PPTP connections to some outside Internet servers.
I had this network up and running with older Cisco3745 with c3745-adventerprisek9-mz.124-12.bin
And I didn't have such issues. No specific NAT configuration were exist, just a ACL with NAT overload statement for outside interface.
Now I have Cisco 7201 router with c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T3.bin IOS image.
I've been wondering if PPTP Passthrough feature is supported in this IOS version\platform.
If yes, I would like to know how to enable it, cause on 3745 I did't make any specific tuning to NAT overloading to have PPTP work.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
02-18-2011 12:21 AM
PPTP has to forward both TCP protocol 1723 and GRE (IP protocol 43) - watch out if you have NAT at both sides of the link.
See http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk827/tk369/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800949c0.shtml
02-18-2011 12:34 AM
Hi Phillip,
Thanks for your feedback, but in my case I have NAT only on my side of the link.
I think the issue is related to NAT inside VRF.
More on that here: https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3296167#3296167
Please, someone close\delete this discussion in WAN R&S section, cause I've opened
another one in Security\Firewalling which is more correct place for it. Thanks.
02-20-2011 08:39 PM
Does anyone have an idea how to fix this issue? Thanks.
02-20-2011 08:51 PM
Is the 7201 doing anything like MPLS-VPN? If so, perhaps CSCtj61284 or CSCsg70334 might apply? Need more details about your situation to comment usefully.
02-22-2011 03:27 AM
Hi Phillip,
Yes, I use VRF-Lite to isolate this network segment from global routing table.
My config looks like this:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.13
encapsulation dot1Q 13
ip vrf forwarding Internet
ip address y.y.y.1 255.255.255.224 secondary
ip address y.y.y.2 255.255.255.224 secondary
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.17
encapsulation dot1Q 17
ip vrf forwarding Internet
ip address z.z.z.z 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
!
ip nat pool POOL_1 y.y.y.1 y.y.y.1 netmask 255.255.255.224
ip nat pool POOL_2 y.y.y.2 y.y.y.2 netmask 255.255.255.224
ip nat inside source list NAT_1 pool POOL_1 vrf Internet overload
ip nat inside source list NAT_2 pool POOL_2 vrf Internet overload
With NAT overload config I have an issue with PPTP tunnels: users are unable to create tunnels to VPN server located somewhere on the Internet.
If I change NAT config to static 1:1 configuration for some selected LAN hosts - the problem disappears.
Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks.
02-28-2011 08:01 PM
Hi Phillip,
Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.
03-01-2011 06:59 AM
Personally, I am out of ideas. Your best course of action at this point is to open a TAC case.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide