01-07-2011 05:39 AM - edited 03-04-2019 10:59 AM
I folks. I'm hoping one of the experts around here can help me figure out what is going wrong.
I run a network that uses MPLS circuits to connect all of the companies different stores. Internet access is through a Cisco ASA5500 here at the corp headquarters.
To make all of this work, we use a little 1721 gateway router to move traffic as needed. All the clients in our corporate office use 10.10.99.1 (Cisco 1721) as a gateway. The 1721 routes the traffic either to the internet (10.10.99.106 Cisco ASA5500) or the MPLS router (159.61.54.30).
For some reason, anything that runs on Linux (Ubuntu server, ReadyNAS boxes, Thecus NAS) will not pass traffic beyond the 1721 gateway router.
I've poured over the config for that router, and I can't find anything that could be causing this not to work. Thinking that the 1721 was bad, I put an 1841 online in it's place, and it did the same thing. I'm a noob when it comes to Cisco configs, but am learning as I go along.
Can someone help me figure out this problem? Ive attached a txt file of the 1721 config.
Thanks.
01-07-2011 05:56 AM
Hi,
on which subnets are these linux machines?
in your post you forgot any ACL / fw config as well as nat config.
Regards.
Alain.
01-07-2011 06:09 AM
THe Linux machines are on the 10.10.99.xxx subnet (255.255.255.0). 10.10.99.104, 10.10.99.150, 10.10.99
.66, 10.10.99.130.
As for the nat configs, I'm not sure how to pull those from the router. All I did was a 'show config' and copied it from Putty to a txt file.
01-07-2011 06:23 AM
Hi,
As for the nat configs, I'm not sure how to pull those from the router.
All I did was a 'show config' and copied it from Putty to a txt file.
sh run | s ip nat and sh access-list will give us what we need.
Regards.
Alain.
01-07-2011 06:42 AM
Per that command, the response was:
sh run | s ip nat:
ip nat inside
sh access-list:
Extended IP access list sl_def_acl
10 deny tcp any any eq telnet log
20 deny tcp any any eq www log
30 deny tcp any any eq 22 log
40 permit ip any any log
THose are the responses from the router.
01-07-2011 06:20 AM
Hi,
a few remarks/questions:
ip route 159.61.23.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245 encompasses next statement unless you change netmask to 255.255.255.224
ip route 159.61.23.32 255.255.255.224 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 159.61.54.32 255.255.255.224 159.61.54.60 why leave default AD here?
ip route 159.61.54.64 255.255.255.224 159.61.54.60 245
Why did you use AD of 245 I don't see the point? As well as 246 on your default
You could also reduce the number of static routes:
ip route 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.2.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.3.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.4.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.6.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.7.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.8.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.9.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245 same as first remarkip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.224 159.61.54.60 245
You could change the 9 routes to 5 routes:
ip route 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.2.0 255.255.254.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.4.0 255.255.252.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.8.0 255.255.254.0 159.61.54.60 245
ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 159.61.54.60 245
Regards.
Alain.
01-07-2011 05:57 AM
Hi
You have truncated the NAT configs on the attached file and also didnt mention the ip address you are using for the linux server.
Need all the NAT related configs and also the ip address configured on the linux server to check the possible reasons for this issue.
regds
01-07-2011 06:29 AM
Hi,
post: sh run int xxx where xxx is interface towards linux and interface towards ASA then sh ip ro static
Can you ping router interface towards ASA sourcing from linux interface?
Regards.
Alain.
01-07-2011 06:40 AM
Hi Alain,
I'm a noob here, so please forgive the dumb questions. When you asked that I run 'sh run int xxx', the xx interface is the IP address of the interface?
We are only using fe0 on this router. The Serial connections are offline as they are not needed.
Thanks.
01-07-2011 06:46 AM
no, sh run int xxx xxx is name of interface e.g f0/0, f0/1
By the way if you are not natting on this router you can get rid of ip nat inside on interface pointing towards linux.
Regards.
Alain.
01-07-2011 06:51 AM
Thanks for the clarification.
Here is the response:
Rantoul_Gateway#sh run int f0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 212 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0
description Rantoul Gateway
ip address 159.61.54.129 255.255.255.224 secondary
ip address 159.61.54.33 255.255.255.224 secondary
ip address 10.10.99.1 255.255.255.0
speed auto
end
01-07-2011 06:57 AM
01-07-2011 07:09 AM
I don't still see the config of interface going to ASA( 10.10.99.106)
you didn't send sh ip route static and sh ip int brief| exc una
Can you ping your ASA from linux interface ? : ping 10.10.99.106 so f0
Regards.
Alain.
01-07-2011 07:21 AM
From the router, I can ping the ASA just fine. We are only using one physical interface on this 1721 (FE0). All traffic goes in/out there.
Here are the command results:
sh ip route static:
Rantoul_Gateway#sh ip route static
159.61.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 16 subnets, 2 masks
S 159.61.240.0/24 [1/0] via 10.10.99.106
S 159.61.54.192/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.55.192/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.53.192/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.59.192/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.86.128/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.53.224/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.59.224/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.54.0/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.55.0/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.57.0/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.23.0/24 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.54.64/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 159.61.54.96/27 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 11 subnets, 3 masks
S 10.10.1.0/24 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 10.10.2.0/23 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 10.10.4.0/22 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 10.10.8.0/23 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 10.10.10.0/24 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 10.10.11.0/24 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 10.10.12.0/24 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 10.10.51.0/24 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 10.10.71.0/24 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S 10.10.111.0/24 [245/0] via 159.61.54.60
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [246/0] via 10.10.99.106
Rantoul_Gateway#
sh ip int brief:
Rantoul_Gateway#sh ip int brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
FastEthernet0 10.10.99.1 YES NVRAM up up
Serial0 unassigned YES manual administratively down down
Serial0.1 unassigned YES manual administratively down down
Rantoul_Gateway#
Thanks.
01-07-2011 07:41 AM
Hi,
From the router, I can ping the ASA just fine. We are only using one physical interface on this 1721 (FE0). All traffic goes in/out there.
what about pings from linux machine 10.10.99.104 ?
if they are unsuccessful can you do: sh ip arp 10.10.99.104
Regards.
Alain.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide