Recently there has been lots of discussion about a webinar given by Openet and Allot that showed this slide.
It showed a scenario where mobile operators charge for over the top service and applications, but charge nothing for applications provided by the mobile operator itself. Some of the scenarios are flat rate fees while other scenarios are usage based. This generated a fairly significant reaction from various people in the industry both positive and negative, but lets face it, mostly negative. It created blogs on the need for net neutrality and for the opposite.
This one chart might now replace the famous traffic growing faster than revenue chart as the most overused slide in the industry.
In contrast, Disruptive Analysis published a blog why application-specific policy and charging won’t work.
What’s interesting about this whole discussion is that our industry used to charge for data based on usage, and no one came to the Field of Dreams. We then moved to flat rate charging and not only is everyone coming to the Field, all sorts of application providers are learning how to profit from it (well, at least make some revenue), and generating significant traffic, which generates profitability concerns. Thus the chart and the question is whether and by how much the pendulum will swing back in the other direction.
There are many challenges with a pendulum swing. Consumers are now used to a model where they don’t have to worry about what they use.I personally think it would be challenging for the pendulum to swing back too far.All operators would have to swing back to the same level.If only a single operator resists, customers would likely move to that provider.Even if all of the operators move to a service specific model, it’s likely an upstart would come in and try to take advantage of the situation.
What does this mean for monetization? It means that operators must think about which models make sense, less drastic models, or more importantly new business models.For example, It doesn’t mean that operators won’t be able to create tiered services.This is now becoming common.This leads to opportunities such as Freemium services where you zero rate certain applications, or Toll Free Broadband where a content provider pays for the data being sent. I would personally be willing to pay for some specific content on a monthly basis; for example, I’d pay to see the New England Patriots play (as long as it’s a flat additional fee and they keep winning). As a consumer, I like to pay flat rate. IIt’s like a breakfast buffet at a hotel.You pay a flat fee for access to certain tables of different types of food, and you can eat as much as you want at that table.
2011 is going to be an exciting year. It will be interesting in a year to see how much changed (or not). Let me know what you think.
Hi,Previous we were using Cisco 7606 as BRAS and the issue was Router keeps on rebooted automatically.OLD Details about Cisco 7606Router 7606 #show versionCisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.2(2)S...
I have successfully registered my SIP endpoints (which we have developed) with Broadsoft sandbox environment. I can make basic calls without problems. When I try to conduct feature tests like Call Waiting (CW), Call Hold (CH), and Call Transfer (CT)...
I am trying to find if there is any Pros or Cons in deploying MPLS with separate customer AS for each site as opposed to one AS. The end goal is to be able to inject default routes from two DCs and be able to make a subset of sites follow one default rout...
So I have attempted the below config: l2vpn
backup disable never
xconnect group Xconns
In one of the discuss, it was initiated to us that there is a specific DB size for example:1 GB and breaching of which will led to crash of Iedge process.I want to replicate the scenario by creating load of user by tool in the lab and track the CDM db uti...