07-17-2017 10:15 AM
Hello,
A new collection was performed on one of our clients with CSPC on July 14, the data was verified and correct, but at the end of the upload in the SNTC Portal it was verified that the information is not the same. Could check for backend processing failure
Adjustments were made to the timeout value in the CSPC settings, since it was not collecting information from ip phones in some exchanges, after the change the collection worked, but this information is not appearing on the portal.
I thank the attention.
07-18-2017 10:37 AM
Hi there,
Thank you for your question. We will have an expert review and respond to you just as soon as possible.
Cheers,
Cheri
07-19-2017 07:36 AM
Hi There,
I see that the upload from Jul 14th was received and reported as processed successfully on the portal. Are you seeing issues with IP Phones reporting on the portal? Could you please send me private message with IP address of Call manager/IP Phones that has issue? Steps to send private message are here
I am sorry if I did not quite understand your issue.
Regards, Suchita
07-24-2017 12:31 PM
Hi There, I have received the private message and am currently analyzing the issue. We will get back as soon as we are able to find the root cause.
Regards
07-25-2017 01:26 PM
Hello,
Can you please share the following with us from the collector?
*Click on Collected Data -> View Data -> Select Dataset.
*Check for all the call managers, the value for the following Dataset: CISCO_CCM_MIB_ccm
*Share a screenshot of the ones with missing phones vs the ones showing phones. We need to see if data is being collected.
Regards,
Cesar
07-25-2017 01:53 PM
07-25-2017 02:24 PM
Hello William,
Thanks for sharing this information. Based on the screenshot, it appears that some data is not being picked up due to potentially a timeout error.
Please try increasing the timeout value of the SNMP version that you are using. It's probably safe to just double the value.
This can be changed on Settings -> Inventory Settings -> Global Timeouts.
Here is an example of SNMPv2c:
Following this, please execute a new inventory and verify if the same dataset is now being populated.
Please post back the results.
Regards,
Cesar
07-26-2017 01:58 PM
07-27-2017 06:40 AM
Good morning William,
Then there is a good chance that the call managers themselves are failing to return data to the SNMP request from the collector.
My recommendation is the following:
The OID is: 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.156.1.1.2.1
Regards,
Cesar
07-27-2017 08:02 AM
Hello Dear Cesar,
I tested the OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.156.1.1.2.1 on the four servers and two nodes that are not presented the information of the devices do not respond, in this case can be a block in the Firewall? I also tested the settings and left the SNMP Master Agent services, it still is not working, do you have any other suggestions?
Best Regards.
William Resende
Log:
[collectorlogin@localhost ~]$ snmpwalk -Os -c sntcv2 -v 2c 10.10.XXX.XXX 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.156.1.1.2.1
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.2.1 = STRING: "SLZIPBX"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.2.2 = STRING: "BSBIPBX"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.2.3 = STRING: "SSAIPBX"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.2.4 = STRING: "BHZIPBX"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.3.1 = STRING: "Subscriber"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.3.2 = STRING: "Publisher"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.3.3 = STRING: "Subscriber"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.3.4 = STRING: "Subscriber"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.4.1 = STRING: "UNKNOWN"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.4.2 = STRING: "10.5.1.11901-1"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.4.3 = STRING: "UNKNOWN"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.4.4 = STRING: "UNKNOWN"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.5.1 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.5.2 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.5.3 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.5.4 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.6.1 = INTEGER: 1
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.6.2 = INTEGER: 1
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.6.3 = INTEGER: 1
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.6.4 = INTEGER: 1
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.7.1 = Hex-STRING: 0A 14 2F FD
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.7.2 = Hex-STRING: 0A 0A 2F FD
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.7.3 = Hex-STRING: 0A 1E 2F FD
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.7.4 = Hex-STRING: 0A 28 2F FD
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.8.1 = STRING: "StandAloneCluster"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.8.2 = STRING: "StandAloneCluster"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.8.3 = STRING: "StandAloneCluster"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.8.4 = STRING: "StandAloneCluster"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.9.1 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.9.2 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.9.3 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.9.4 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.10.1 = ""
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.10.2 = ""
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.10.3 = ""
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.10.4 = ""
[collectorlogin@localhost ~]$ snmpwalk -Os -c sntcv2 -v 2c 10.20.XXX.XXX 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.156.1.1.2.1
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.2.1 = STRING: "SLZIPBX"
Timeout: No Response from 10.20.47.253
[collectorlogin@localhost ~]$ snmpwalk -Os -c sntcv2 -v 2c 10.30.XXX.XXX1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.156.1.1.2.1
Timeout: No Response from 10.30.47.253
[collectorlogin@localhost ~]$ snmpwalk -Os -c sntcv2 -v 2c 10.40.XXX.XXX 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.156.1.1.2.1
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.2.1 = STRING: "SLZIPBX"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.2.2 = STRING: "BSBIPBX"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.2.3 = STRING: "SSAIPBX"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.2.4 = STRING: "BHZIPBX"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.3.1 = STRING: "Subscriber"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.3.2 = STRING: "Publisher"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.3.3 = STRING: "Subscriber"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.3.4 = STRING: "Subscriber"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.4.1 = STRING: "UNKNOWN"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.4.2 = STRING: "UNKNOWN"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.4.3 = STRING: "UNKNOWN"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.4.4 = STRING: "10.5.1.11901-1"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.5.1 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.5.2 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.5.3 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.5.4 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.6.1 = INTEGER: 1
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.6.2 = INTEGER: 1
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.6.3 = INTEGER: 1
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.6.4 = INTEGER: 1
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.7.1 = Hex-STRING: 0A 14 2F FD
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.7.2 = Hex-STRING: 0A 0A 2F FD
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.7.3 = Hex-STRING: 0A 1E 2F FD
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.7.4 = Hex-STRING: 0A 28 2F FD
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.8.1 = STRING: "StandAloneCluster"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.8.2 = STRING: "StandAloneCluster"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.8.3 = STRING: "StandAloneCluster"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.8.4 = STRING: "StandAloneCluster"
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.9.1 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.9.2 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.9.3 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.9.4 = INTEGER: 2
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.10.1 = ""
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.10.2 = ""
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.10.3 = ""
enterprises.9.9.156.1.1.2.1.10.4 = ""
[collectorlogin@localhost ~]$
07-27-2017 10:33 AM
Hi William,
The only thing I can think is to pass the "-t" flag to your snmpwalk and try very high values in case it really is a timeout issue.
This would not be a firewall issue as you seem to be capturing data for other MIBs.
The best thing to do next is to request support with the CUCM support team or support community as this falls beyond my area of expertise. This issue seems to be on the call managers themselves.
Regards,
Cesar
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide