11-30-2012 11:32 AM
Hi everybody,
i´m using a Cisco SF300 (SRW224G4P) in my network and i´m using Vlan´s.
I´m getting a lot of packet´s loss in the network and the users are experiencing the lack of performance.
There are in total seven switch´s in the network, 6 Cisco SF200 as "access" switch´s and 1 Cisco SF300 as the "Core" switch.
There is almost 170 devices connected to the network, mainly IP cameras, other devices are some DVR´s and NVR´s, one server a some PC´s.
Thing is i´m having packet´s loss, and i found this alarm in the SF300:
2147480831 2012-Jul-06 13:14:45 Warning %IPFFT-W-SFFTREDYELLOW: IP SFFT Table Overflow, aggregated (1)
2147480831 2012-Jul-06 13:14:45 Warning %IPFFT-W-SFFTREDYELLOW: IP SFFT Table Overflow
Some people are saying this switch (SF300) support´s only 100 hosts and that´s why i´m getting this alarm and loosing packets.
But i cant find the host´s limit in the switch specification in any Cisco document.
What do you think on this?
There is a limitation of 100 hosts for this switch?
Thanks in advance!
Carlos
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-30-2012 12:20 PM
Hi Calavalle, the layer 3 module can only hardware switch 100 before it starts software switching. The switch can support up to 510 IP addresses but anything over 100 will have expected performance degradation.
-Tom
Please rate helpful posts
12-05-2012 03:31 PM
The SX500 will have the same behavior as the SX300. A 2960 would be better suited for 100-200 users.
-Tom
Please rate helpful posts
11-30-2012 12:20 PM
Hi Calavalle, the layer 3 module can only hardware switch 100 before it starts software switching. The switch can support up to 510 IP addresses but anything over 100 will have expected performance degradation.
-Tom
Please rate helpful posts
12-05-2012 03:20 PM
Tom, thanks a lot for your fast and accurate answer.
I will "shoot" you a new question to see if you can help me a little bit more:
According to your answer, the performance degradation in the network is important so i want to change the "core" switch for a different equipment more according to the requirements. I have two questions about this:
1- Do you think i have to go to a Catalyst line switch, for example a 2960 like the WS-C2960-24PC-L?
Or is ok/enough to go to an SF500 like the SF500-24P-K9-AR?
2- Do you think it is OK to use a new "core" switch? Or it is maybe possible and technically better to think in use a router for all the VLan´s routing/switching?
Thanks in advance again,
Carlos
12-05-2012 03:31 PM
The SX500 will have the same behavior as the SX300. A 2960 would be better suited for 100-200 users.
-Tom
Please rate helpful posts
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide