09-17-2013 04:56 PM - edited 03-07-2019 03:32 PM
Hi,
I came across an interesting scenario recently when a Cisco 2960G-24TC-L switch failed (4x ASIC dual SFP/TX ports stopped working)
This switch had a GLC-GE-100FX sfp downlink connection to 2940 which worked fine.
The only spare switch I had to replace the 2960G-24 was a 2960G-48TC-L which you would think being in the same family would be indentical but with more port capacity?
Here lies the question to Cisco:
Why on earth would you not make these two switches identical to the point where one requires a GLC-GE-100FX sfp (24 port) BUT the 2960G-48TC-L requires a GLC-FE-100 sfp to be compatible??
This to me does not make any sense what so ever - further more after spending hours tracing the problem with getting the link into full duplex, it has cost me another different sfp to get this link working.
When I used the GLC-GE-100 on the 48 port switch and set the media-type, the link would stop, so I checked the 100mb sfp compatibilty sheet and found the above to my complete amazement.
Both switches have GE dual sfp/tx ports so why the difference?
If someone can answer the above, I would at least know why cisco have done this?
thanks
09-17-2013 05:19 PM
Both switches you mentioned C2960G-24TC-L and C2960G-48TC-L support both FCL-FE-100FX and GLC-GE-100FX..
Table 2 second and fifth rows.
09-17-2013 07:01 PM
ok, I see that in Table 8.
I wasnt doing anything different between the two switches so that does not explain the results I was getting unless....
Maybe the GLC-GE-100FX Gbic is faulty?
I will test on another 2960G-24 and 48 port switch.
Thanks for the reply.
09-19-2013 04:28 AM
Could you post #show inventory when sfp is inserted. Try to setup duplex and speed before inserting sfp.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide