07-24-2017 10:12 AM - edited 03-08-2019 11:27 AM
Hi there,
Thanks for reading!
I have a production core switch which has a network absent from the routing process. I expect no impact from adding the subnet but am looking for confirmation. In my mind, the only impact would be increased memory & cpu usage and that the services offered by the core switch would be visible to an additional network.
Thanks again for reading!
Bob
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-24-2017 11:16 AM
Bob
If you mean just configure another network statement under EIGRP then this all this does is start EIGRP on any interfaces covered by that network statement.
So it should simply mean an additional route or routes being advertised.
The impact on the switch resources should be minimal.
Jon
07-24-2017 11:16 AM
Bob
If you mean just configure another network statement under EIGRP then this all this does is start EIGRP on any interfaces covered by that network statement.
So it should simply mean an additional route or routes being advertised.
The impact on the switch resources should be minimal.
Jon
07-24-2017 11:30 AM
Hi Jon,
Thanks for commenting.
Yes, i'm just adding the network 192.168.x.x command. Just want to cover bases since it's a prod device.
Bob
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide