The answer depends on both overall volume of the traffic, and how/where the traffic actually flows.
Many of Cisco's modern Enterprise switches are "wire speed" capable for all their ports, meaning if all ports are at 100% capacity, the switch has an internal switch fabric bandwidth to handle the full aggregate of all the ports and the switch also has the PPS capacity to forward all those port's bandwidth even if all the packets are minimum sized.
Where modern Enterprise switches show their differences tend to be what happens when multiple ingress ports send to fewer egress ports. I.e. what happens when there's egress port congestion?
The lower end switches often have less interface buffer RAM, meaning that if egress ports congest, they are more likely to drop traffic. Also, lower end switches may have less QoS feature to "manage" what should happen when an egress port congests.
The foregoing is just a long way of saying again, without knowing much more about your expected traffic, and how it will flow, one cannot predict how suitable any particular switch might be. Your later post asks about a 3850 and 2960 combination. That might be perfect, or it might be horrible. (Oh, with either, if you stack them, how the stacks behave, relative to your traffic, has its own set of considerations.)
