07-24-2019 09:41 PM
I have a console server that I need to deploy in a remote cage that is only accessible by a long-reach SM fiber connection.
I have a CIsco 2911 with a 16-port card for console connections, a 4-port switchport card for local connections and a SFP interface to house the SFP.
I would like to have the switchport and the routed SFP to be in the same VLAN. I tried to use a BVI between the routed interface and the VLAN interface used for the switched ports, but it doesn't seem to work.
Am I overthinking this?
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/0
description CHG-GW-01 Gig 1/1/4
no ip address
media-type sfp
bridge-group 1
!
interface Vlan9
no ip address
bridge-group 1
interface BVI1
ip address 10.9.140.251 255.255.0.0
bridge 1 protocol ieee
bridge 1 route ip
07-24-2019 10:58 PM
"I would like to have the switchport and the routed SFP to be in the same VLAN"
any reason why you would like to have above setup ? if i understand correctly if this terminal server, you like to connect to this 2911 and loging to other kit ? please confirm ?
07-24-2019 11:02 PM
I have switches that need to be connected through Ethernet to the same out-of-band VLAN as the other cage.
I found a few other sample configurations and it looks it will work if I convert the gi0/1 interface to a tagged sub-interface.
07-24-2019 11:05 PM
you can configure as trunk and allow what ever vlan you requires. or l3 port-channel, depends on requirement and what suitable for you.
07-25-2019 08:38 AM
If I use the sub-interface on the gi0/1/0 interface and set the vlan on the switchports, do I need the bridge, or will that just work because of the tagging?
07-25-2019 10:36 AM
If I am understanding the situation correctly then you do not need the bridge. The sub interfaces with tagging will work.
HTH
Rick
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide