10-09-2017 01:27 PM - edited 03-08-2019 12:19 PM
I have a topology with 1 x Cisco WS-6509-E Layer 3 Switch connected to 1 x HPE FF 5700-40XG-2QSFP+ Switch and another HPE FF 5700-40XG-2QSFP+ Switch. These HPE FF 5700s are each connected to 2 x HP 5130-48G-PoE+-4SFP+ (370W) EI Switches and 1 x HP 5130-24G-4SFP+ EI Switch. The Cisco WS-6509-E has the udld aggressive command globally configured. I am trying to establish two connections running from each HP 5130 switch to each of the HP FF 5700s. I have the udld aggressive command configured globally on the Cisco WS-6509-E. On two of the HP 5130s I have the lldp compliance cdp command configured but on one I don't have it configured. When I try to make a dual connection from the switch running from the switch with lldp compliance cdp command configured, I get the link to one of the HP FF 5700 placed into err-diabled. The logs below show what happened:
Jul 15 11:08:28.682 PDT: %UDLD-SP-4-UDLD_PORT_DISAB
Jul 15 11:08:28.682 PDT: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: udld error detected on <port>, putting <port> in err-disable state
Jul 15 11:08:28.758 PDT: %PM-SPSTBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: udld error detected on <port>, putting <port> in err-disable state
Should I undo lldp compliance cdp command on the HP 5130 switches in order to get a dual connection to the HP FF 5700s?
10-09-2017 11:04 PM
10-12-2017 11:28 AM
I haven't tried disabling UDLD on a per port basis. Should I also try configuring DLDP (HP comware version of UDLD) on the HP switches and its connecting ports connected to the Cisco WS-6509-E switch?
Jonathan
10-12-2017 01:04 PM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide