05-21-2008 10:51 AM - edited 03-05-2019 11:08 PM
I have a 4506 with about 30 SVI's. I have a connection through a metro service provider for a branch with a 3560 in layer 3. It has a few SVI's on it. I am running EIGRP between the 3560 and my 4506. router eigrp 100, network 10.0.0.0, auto sum. The problem is on the 3560 i keep getting a "IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor 10.0.34.1 not on common subnet for Vlan1" I have double checked the configs and i have vlan 34 configured correctly. it is configured just like all of my other SVI's on the 4506. why would i be getting this error? The configuration works great, the error just keeps showing up in the log
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-21-2008 03:51 PM
I'm not questioning your design. When I ask a question is for a reason. I asked before if you were trunking the interface and you said no. About 5 responses later, it comes to light that you are trunking. That was a time wasted for you and for me.
Again, I asked you if you were pruning the Vlans and you said you are only sending Vlan 1 towards the ISP. The portion of the config above clearly indicates that you aren't pruning and all the Vlans are being forwarded to the HP switch. You don't want that as it can create problems. You have no control on the HP side so you want to limit what is sent to the ISP. They told only Vlan 1 is the transport Vlan, then you only send that Vlan and prune the rest.
You should have asked those questions before. I can't tell the level of knowledge from a poster unless the poster ask for more clarification.
The problem indicates there is a Vlan leakage from the HP to the 3750 within the ISP and it's passing Vlan 34 for some odd reason. You can control this behavior by pruning your Vlans per Victor's command.
Let us know how it works out.
__
Edison.
05-22-2008 03:15 AM
i didn't realize that it defaults to sending ALL vlans. i will prune it this morning on both ends. I can only send one vlan over that link to my knowledge. The serivce provider can't support multiple vlans since i am on one of there vlans. If we could use DOT1Q in Q then we wouldn't be having this conversation. I didn't think it was possible for a vlan to "leak" like that. I appreciate both of your help. THANKS!
05-22-2008 04:19 AM
I only allowed vlan 1 over the link and the error went away. As far as the consistency i'm going to get with the ISP and go over a few frame tagging issues. Thanks for your help.
05-22-2008 05:10 AM
Great news. Glad I could help.
Thanks for the rating.
Victor
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide