12-03-2009 06:06 AM - edited 03-06-2019 08:48 AM
hi! i'm trying to connect my blade server's cisco sw module to
the 6509 core by pairing 2 links as a
channel group. below are the related config. The problem is encounter is that i can see the sw neighbor by using sh cdp nei, but i'm not able to ping
the gateway or the management vlan of the blade sw from the 6509 or from the blade sw to other network. I tried to join the vtp domain of the new blade sw to our existing vtp domain, it doesn't get populated into the blade sw as well. what could be the issue here? (native vlan is the same for both side) did i miss out something here? thanks.
6509
---------
interface Port-channel21
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/10
description uplink1 to bladechassis
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 21 mode desirable
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/20
description uplink1 to bladechassis
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 21 mode desirable
bladechassis sw module
-------------------------------
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
description Uplink 1
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 2 mode desirable
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/18
description Uplink 2
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 2 mode desirable
!
interface Vlan1
10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip-default gateway 10.1.1.254 255.255.255.0
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-03-2009 04:48 PM
hi! i'm trying to connect my blade server's cisco sw module to
the 6509 core by pairing 2 links as a
channel group. below are the related config. The problem is encounter is that i can see the sw neighbor by using sh cdp nei, but i'm not able to ping
the gateway or the management vlan of the blade sw from the 6509 or from the blade sw to other network. I tried to join the vtp domain of the new blade sw to our existing vtp domain, it doesn't get populated into the blade sw as well. what could be the issue here? (native vlan is the same for both side) did i miss out something here? thanks.
6509
---------
interface Port-channel21
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport mode trunk
!interface GigabitEthernet1/10
description uplink1 to bladechassis
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 21 mode desirable
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/20
description uplink1 to bladechassis
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 21 mode desirablebladechassis sw module
-------------------------------
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
description Uplink 1
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 2 mode desirable
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/18
description Uplink 2
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 2 mode desirable
!
interface Vlan1
10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0ip-default gateway 10.1.1.254 255.255.255.0
Can you post the output from both the 6500 and the blade chassis
1) sh interface trunk
2) sh etherchannel summary
you don't have a port-channel interface shown in your blade config - did you just miss it out ?
Presumably 10.1.1.254 is the IP address of L3 interface for vlan on the 6500 ?
Jon
12-03-2009 05:03 PM
Does the channel show up ? Show ether summary. Also keep this in mind those switches are not managed thru the port channel . They are managed thru a separate connection to the server management module so if this link is not connected or there is a problem with that link you won't be able to ping the switches even if the port channel is up and active . So basically you have your etherchannel connections and a separate connection to the server mgt. module thru which the cisco switches are managed. I believe it is a config option now to be able to manage them thru the uplinks but by default they are managed thru the mgt. module . If this is the case then the 6500 would have to have a VLan 1 SVI configured with the default gateway address for that address space.
12-03-2009 06:30 AM
Hello,
Can you provide more info:
1- What type of Cisco switches are these?
2-Are they located within a chassis?
3-Are you stacking the switches you are connecting to the 6500?
Reza
12-03-2009 04:34 PM
Can you provide more info:
1- What type of Cisco switches are these?
the bladechassis's switch is a 4ports cisco sw module
2-Are they located within a chassis?
the bladechassis and 6509 are 2 seperate box
3-Are you stacking the switches you are connecting to the 6500?
no there's only one switch module within that blade server chassis.
thx
12-03-2009 04:48 PM
hi! i'm trying to connect my blade server's cisco sw module to
the 6509 core by pairing 2 links as a
channel group. below are the related config. The problem is encounter is that i can see the sw neighbor by using sh cdp nei, but i'm not able to ping
the gateway or the management vlan of the blade sw from the 6509 or from the blade sw to other network. I tried to join the vtp domain of the new blade sw to our existing vtp domain, it doesn't get populated into the blade sw as well. what could be the issue here? (native vlan is the same for both side) did i miss out something here? thanks.
6509
---------
interface Port-channel21
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport mode trunk
!interface GigabitEthernet1/10
description uplink1 to bladechassis
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 21 mode desirable
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/20
description uplink1 to bladechassis
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 21 mode desirablebladechassis sw module
-------------------------------
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
description Uplink 1
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 2 mode desirable
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/18
description Uplink 2
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 2 mode desirable
!
interface Vlan1
10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0ip-default gateway 10.1.1.254 255.255.255.0
Can you post the output from both the 6500 and the blade chassis
1) sh interface trunk
2) sh etherchannel summary
you don't have a port-channel interface shown in your blade config - did you just miss it out ?
Presumably 10.1.1.254 is the IP address of L3 interface for vlan on the 6500 ?
Jon
12-03-2009 05:03 PM
Does the channel show up ? Show ether summary. Also keep this in mind those switches are not managed thru the port channel . They are managed thru a separate connection to the server management module so if this link is not connected or there is a problem with that link you won't be able to ping the switches even if the port channel is up and active . So basically you have your etherchannel connections and a separate connection to the server mgt. module thru which the cisco switches are managed. I believe it is a config option now to be able to manage them thru the uplinks but by default they are managed thru the mgt. module . If this is the case then the 6500 would have to have a VLan 1 SVI configured with the default gateway address for that address space.
12-08-2009 08:56 AM
hi! alll.....thank. the issue has been resolved.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide