cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
57786
Views
11
Helpful
5
Replies

Inconsistent Peer VLAN ID

Fenderbridge
Level 1
Level 1

I'm having some trouble trying to figure out why I'm getting the following errors in my logs.  This morning, for the first time in over a year, my switch stopped communicating with my core switch,  so I checked the log.

 

Feb 27 16:25:15.364 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU with inconsistent peer vlan id 1 on GigabitEthernet5/13 VLAN100.
Feb 27 16:25:15.364 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_PEER: Blocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0001. Inconsistent peer vlan.
Feb 27 16:25:15.364 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0100. Inconsistent local vlan.
Feb 27 16:25:15.364 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_PEER: Blocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0111. Inconsistent peer vlan.
Feb 27 16:25:15.364 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_PEER: Blocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0161. Inconsistent peer vlan.
Feb 27 16:25:15.364 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_PEER: Blocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0325. Inconsistent peer vlan.
Feb 27 16:25:15.364 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_PEER: Blocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0401. Inconsistent peer vlan.
Feb 27 16:25:15.364 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_PEER: Blocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0441. Inconsistent peer vlan.
Feb 27 16:25:15.364 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_PEER: Blocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0471. Inconsistent peer vlan.
Feb 27 16:25:15.364 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_PEER: Blocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0472. Inconsistent peer vlan.
Feb 27 16:25:15.364 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_PEER: Blocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0775. Inconsistent peer vlan.
Feb 27 16:25:15.632 UTC: %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON: Port Gi5/13 has become dot1q trunk
Feb 27 16:25:17.131 UTC: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet5/13, changed state to up
Feb 27 16:25:18.131 UTC: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet5/13, changed state to up
Feb 27 16:25:31.139 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-UNBLOCK_CONSIST_PORT: Unblocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0472. Port consistency restored.
Feb 27 16:25:31.379 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-UNBLOCK_CONSIST_PORT: Unblocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0775. Port consistency restored.
Feb 27 16:25:31.680 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-UNBLOCK_CONSIST_PORT: Unblocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0471. Port consistency restored.
Feb 27 16:25:31.888 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-UNBLOCK_CONSIST_PORT: Unblocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0161. Port consistency restored.
Feb 27 16:25:31.888 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-UNBLOCK_CONSIST_PORT: Unblocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0401. Port consistency restored.
Feb 27 16:25:32.023 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-UNBLOCK_CONSIST_PORT: Unblocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0111. Port consistency restored.
Feb 27 16:25:32.360 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-UNBLOCK_CONSIST_PORT: Unblocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0325. Port consistency restored.
Feb 27 16:25:32.361 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-UNBLOCK_CONSIST_PORT: Unblocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0441. Port consistency restored.
Feb 27 16:25:33.010 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-UNBLOCK_CONSIST_PORT: Unblocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0001. Port consistency restored.
Feb 27 16:25:33.010 UTC: %SPANTREE-2-UNBLOCK_CONSIST_PORT: Unblocking GigabitEthernet5/13 on VLAN0100. Port consistency restored.
Feb 27 17:19:22.515 UTC: %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON: Port Gi5/13 has become non-trunk
Feb 27 17:19:22.998 UTC: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet5/13, changed state to down
Feb 27 17:19:24.012 UTC: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet5/13, changed state to down

 

 

 

I checked the configurations on both sides, and they appear to be the same.

 

Sw1#src int g1/1/1
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 241 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
description Core-Switch-1
switchport trunk native vlan 100
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
logging event trunk-status
logging event spanning-tree
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
end

 

Sw1#src int g1/1/2
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 238 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2
description Core-Switch-2
switchport trunk native vlan 100
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
logging event trunk-status
logging event spanning-tree
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
end

 

 

 

Core-Switch1#src int g5/13
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 239 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet5/13
description Sw1 g1/1/1
switchport trunk native vlan 100
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
logging event link-status
logging event trunk-status
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
end

 

 

Core-Switch-2#src int g5/13
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 239 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet5/13
description Sw1 g1/1/2
switchport trunk native vlan 100
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
logging event link-status
logging event trunk-status
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
end

 

 

Anyone have any ideas on why this may be happening?  And why it happened randomly overnight, and again at noon?

src=sho run alias.

Thank you very much in advance!

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Jaderson Pessoa
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni
Sometime ago i had this same issue, but my problem were different versions of spanning-tree. I suggest to you check the whole configuration about your STP topology.
Jaderson Pessoa
*** Rate All Helpful Responses ***

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5

balaji.bandi
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

we do not know the whole topology of your network and  full spanning tree config, so i would suggest to refer below document  :

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/lan-switching/spanning-tree-protocol/24063-pvid-inconsistency-24063.html

 

More advise post the full configruation of all the devices

 

BB

***** Rate All Helpful Responses *****

How to Ask The Cisco Community for Help

Jaderson Pessoa
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni
Sometime ago i had this same issue, but my problem were different versions of spanning-tree. I suggest to you check the whole configuration about your STP topology.
Jaderson Pessoa
*** Rate All Helpful Responses ***

That's the one!  sho span sum showed the following:

 

Sw1#sho span summ
Switch is in rapid-pvst mode
Root bridge for: VLAN0001

 

Looking at all of the other switches on the topology, none of them were root bridges except for the core switches.

 

Thank you for the pointer! 

Thanks for the positive feedback.

Best regards.

Jaderson Pessoa
*** Rate All Helpful Responses ***

Hi! sorry for reviving this post.

 

What was the problem exactly? were the switches using different stp versions?

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card