07-14-2011 02:22 AM - edited 03-07-2019 01:12 AM
I'm currently using DLSW to bridge a VLAN to a remote site and it works fine. I've been reading up on L2TPv3 and now I'm wondering if one is better than the other for my purposes (my hardware will support both), especially if multiple VLANS are being bridged to the remote site.
We do not have an MPLS infrastructure, so that's not an option.
Thanks.
07-14-2011 10:17 AM
If it's not broken don't fix it......in my opinion
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App
03-21-2012 09:27 AM
I have the following routers
Router 1
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
FastEthernet0/0 192.168.192.20 YES NVRAM up up
FastEthernet0/1 63.232.181.14 YES NVRAM up up
FastEthernet0/3/0 10.1.1.3 YES NVRAM up up
NVI0 192.168.192.20 YES unset up up
Multilink88 65.102.24.102 YES NVRAM administratively down down
Router 2
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
GigabitEthernet0/0 10.4.52.10 YES NVRAM up up
GigabitEthernet0/1 172.31.150.2 YES NVRAM administratively down down
Serial0/0/0:0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/0/1:0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/1/0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Multilink1 65.102.24.134 YES NVRAM up up
I understand that I need to create a pseudowire-class l2tp-auto entry, but would I do it on my g0/0 interface since that is the vlan I want to extend from router 2? And would I create a simular entry on router 1
FastEthernet0/3/0 since that is the vlan I want it to reach? I appreciate all help.
Thanks
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide