01-10-2013 02:07 AM - edited 03-07-2019 11:00 AM
my one of client site is phasing an internal network latency issue,what should i do to troubleshoot.
my access switches is connected to core switch via a trunk link,it is tier 2 network.
Ping response of interface vlan ip of core switch from access switch.
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.60.3.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
01-10-2013 05:23 AM
If you are pinging an SVI and the switch is busy doing something else, the switch gives low priority to ping packets.
You may get a more accurate response, if you ping from one host to another.
HTH
01-10-2013 06:21 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
First determine if there really is a latency problem. "Ordinary" ping, alone, is not designed for high accuracy latency measurements, it was designed to determine if a host is on-line and if there's two way reachability.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide