10-16-2014 12:44 PM - edited 03-07-2019 09:09 PM
I have an access-list MANAGEMENT
permit udp any eq snmp any
permit udp any any eq snmp
permit tcp any any eq telnet
permit tcp any eq telnet any
permit tcp any any eq 22
permit tcp any eq 22 any
My question does it matter if I use a match-any or match-all. I want to match anything in the access-list to classify the traffic correctly
class-map type qos match-any MANAGEMENT
match access-group name MANAGEMENT
Or
class-map type qos match-all MANAGEMENT
match access-group name MANAGEMENT
I understand a match-any is an or and a match-all is an and function. Does this apply to an access-list for a class-map?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-16-2014 09:54 PM
It applies to match statements within the class map. In your case, you're only using one match statement, so there will be no difference between match-all and match-any, no matter how many entries are in the ACL. If your class map had two different ACLs in two different match statements , then the and/or logic of match-all and match-any would come into play.
10-16-2014 09:54 PM
It applies to match statements within the class map. In your case, you're only using one match statement, so there will be no difference between match-all and match-any, no matter how many entries are in the ACL. If your class map had two different ACLs in two different match statements , then the and/or logic of match-all and match-any would come into play.
10-17-2014 05:05 AM
Thanks makes sense
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide