01-07-2015 06:26 AM - edited 03-07-2019 10:07 PM
Hi all,
I have the following configuration ,
ip access-list extended BLOCK
deny ip 46.38.56.0 0.0.7.255 any
!
!
class BLOCK
priority 8
set dscp ef
policy-map QOS
!
service-policy output BLOCK
The idea for this is to give the lowest
Any ideas?
Thanks
01-07-2015 06:48 AM
Access-list doesn't match any packets. If you would like match all packets except network 46.38.56.0 0.0.7.255 You should use
permit ip any any
after deny ip 46.38.56....
01-07-2015 07:11 AM
Hi all,
All the
Thanks.
01-07-2015 07:53 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Could you further define what you mean by providing minimum bandwidth?
If you mean last to get bandwidth, use a bandwidth statement rather than the priority statement. Setting to 8, I recall, will provide the lowest possible dequeuing priority.
Then match the traffic you want to provide this low priority to.
You might also consider a generic policy such as:
policy-map generic
class LLQ
priority percent 33
class HiPriority
bandwidth remaining percent 81
fair-queue
class LoPriority
bandwidth remaining percent 1
fair-queue
class class-default
bandwidth remaining percent 9
fair-queue
The above (as a model) often addresses about 99% of any QoS needs (for congestion management), just direct traffic to the "correct" class.
01-07-2015 06:55 AM
Hello
Are you showing the complete acl listing here?
What is the QOS policy map performing?
Applying 8Kps of LLQ to a class map that is matching on a ACL with a deny ACE range doesn't make sense to me, a permit value would be more viable solution.
Can you show the full qos configuration if applicable?
res
Paul
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide