10-31-2019 10:51 AM
10-31-2019 12:37 PM
Since you are applying the policy to individual interfaces and since the iSCSI devices are in a different vlan, it should not effect other ports and/or other vlans. That said, after adding QOS to these ports, I would keep an eye on them for a period of time to make sure everything is functioning as excepted as sometimes, QOS config can produce strange behavior.
HTH
11-02-2019 11:31 AM
11-02-2019 05:53 AM
Sounds good, I will give it a try.
What do you think about the PPS on the vlan interface? Is that normal?
Thanks,
Diego
11-02-2019 09:47 AM
Hi Diego,
The largest number is see in the output you posted is 11,988,000 which is less than 12Mbps. I personally don't think that is too much of a concern, Just be careful when you deploy QOS specially on the 3850s, as they are not designed to be used for servers, storage, VM, etc.. They are mainly used for user campus environments and not so much for data centers.
Anyway, good Luck!
11-03-2019 09:41 AM - edited 11-03-2019 09:42 AM
I understand these switches are not designed for iSCSI but I needed/wanted a bunch of 10G ports and the Nexus stuff (or any iSCSI specific 10G switch) is -way- too expensive.
From what you guys are telling me it sounds like I should apply the policy on all physical ports not just the ports dedicated to iSCSI traffic, correct?
Also, my concern with the file I uploaded was with the fact that there appears to be a significant amount of traffic on the vlan interface itself. I would think the vlan interface would only come into play when data from iSCSI vlan is routed to/from other vlans. There should be practically no traffic coming/leaving the ISCSI vlan so those numbers seem odd to me. Maybe the vlan interface is counting/aggregating traffic count on all the iSCSI vlan access interfaces?
11-02-2019 11:40 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide