cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1086
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies

Stackwise virtual not working either

pwiscott
Level 1
Level 1

So after trying to use vrrp/vrrs (and getting no where as it seems nobody has ever tried this on a 9500 based on responses to a previous email) I thought I would try stackwise virtual which to be fair I have had more success with but cannot get dual action detection to work.

I have the following config.

 

stackwise-virtual
domain 1
dual-active detection pagp trust channel-group 1

 

 interface HundredGigE1/0/25
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/26
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/27
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/28
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable

 

interface HundredGigE2/0/25
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/26
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/27
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/28
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable

 

interface Port-channel1
description stackwise-dad
no ip address

 

Hu1/0/25 stackwise-virtual connected 4094 full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu1/0/26 stackwise-virtual connected 4094 full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu1/0/27 stackwise-dad suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu1/0/28 stackwise-dad suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)

 

Hu2/0/25 stackwise-virtual connected 4094 full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu2/0/26 stackwise-virtual connected 4094 full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu2/0/27 stackwise-dad suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu2/0/28 stackwise-dad suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Po1 stackwise-dad notconnect routed auto auto N/A

 

Switch/Stack Mac Address : 3c13.cc01.9480 - Local Mac Address
Mac persistency wait time: Indefinite
H/W Current
Switch# Role Mac Address Priority Version State
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1 Active 3c13.cc01.9480 15 V02 Ready
2 Standby 802d.bfda.7ce0 13 V02 Ready

 

Channel group 1
Dual-Active Partner Partner Partner
Port Detect Capable Name Port Version
Hu1/0/27 No None None N/A
Hu1/0/28 No None None N/A
Hu2/0/27 Yes None None 1.1
Hu2/0/28 No None None N/A

 

No idea why the port channel wont come up as I have followed this https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst9500/software/release/16-12/configuration_guide/ha/b_1612_ha_9500_cg/configuring_cisco_stackwise_virtual.html#concept_ad5_4wx_31b

 

Regards

Scott

5 Replies 5

Hello,

 

make sure you are not running into any of the restrictions mentioned in the link below:

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst9500/software/release/16-9/configuration_guide/ha/b_169_ha_9500_cg/configuring_cisco_stackwise_virtual.html#concept_gbh_lxx_31b

 

The output you have posted is truncated, make sure it looks like below:

 

Switch 1

 

interface port-channel 1
stackwise-virtual
domain 1
dual-active detection pagp trust channel-group 1
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/25
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/26
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/27
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/28
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable

 

Switch 2

 

interface port-channel 1
stackwise-virtual
domain 1
dual-active detection pagp trust channel-group 1

!
interface HundredGigE2/0/25
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/26
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/27
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/28
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable

 

I assume you have reloaded both switches after configuring SVL and DAD ?

pwiscott
Level 1
Level 1

Unfortunately seems to go from bad to worse !.

extract from show run

stackwise-virtual
domain 1
dual-active detection pagp trust channel-group 1

 

interface Port-channel1
no ip address

 

interface HundredGigE1/0/27
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable

 

interface HundredGigE2/0/27
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable

 

 - from show interface status

Hu1/0/27 suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)

Hu2/0/27 suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)

Po1 notconnect routed auto auto N/A

 

 - from show log

%ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL1: Hu1/0/27 suspended: PAgP not enabled on the remote port.

%ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL1: Hu2/0/27 suspended: PAgP not enabled on the remote port.

 

I have tried reloading the entire stack - still the same. 

I am starting to think that there is either a license problem or a bug that doesnt allow for pagp port channels.

Details of license and version (just in case)

 Technology-package Technology-package
Current Type Next reboot
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
network-advantage Smart License network-advantage
dna-advantage Subscription Smart License dna-advantage 

 

Cisco IOS XE Software, Version 16.09.05
Cisco IOS Software [Fuji], Catalyst L3 Switch Software (CAT9K_IOSXE), Version 16.9.5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

 

 

Hello,

 

weird indeed. Can you try LACP ?

Yup - Works fine

Hu1/0/28 connected routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)

Hu2/0/28 connected routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)

 

Po2 connected routed a-full a-10G N/A

 

interface HundredGigE1/0/28
no ip address
channel-group 2 mode on
end

 

interface HundredGigE2/0/28
no ip address
channel-group 2 mode on
end

 

Port-channel2 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is EtherChannel, address is 3c13.cc01.9501 (bia 3c13.cc01.9501)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 20000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 10Gb/s, link type is auto, media type is N/A
input flow-control is on, output flow-control is unsupported
Members in this channel: Hu1/0/28 Hu2/0/28

 

Hello,

 

I checked for bugs, none found. It does definitely sound like one. Weird that it doesn't work with PAgP, which is Cisco-proprietary, but is does with the open standard LACP.

 

If you have a support contract, you could raise a TAC case to report this is a bug.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card