08-17-2020 04:50 AM
So after trying to use vrrp/vrrs (and getting no where as it seems nobody has ever tried this on a 9500 based on responses to a previous email) I thought I would try stackwise virtual which to be fair I have had more success with but cannot get dual action detection to work.
I have the following config.
stackwise-virtual
domain 1
dual-active detection pagp trust channel-group 1
interface HundredGigE1/0/25
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/26
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/27
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/28
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
interface HundredGigE2/0/25
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/26
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/27
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/28
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
interface Port-channel1
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
Hu1/0/25 stackwise-virtual connected 4094 full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu1/0/26 stackwise-virtual connected 4094 full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu1/0/27 stackwise-dad suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu1/0/28 stackwise-dad suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu2/0/25 stackwise-virtual connected 4094 full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu2/0/26 stackwise-virtual connected 4094 full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu2/0/27 stackwise-dad suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu2/0/28 stackwise-dad suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Po1 stackwise-dad notconnect routed auto auto N/A
Switch/Stack Mac Address : 3c13.cc01.9480 - Local Mac Address
Mac persistency wait time: Indefinite
H/W Current
Switch# Role Mac Address Priority Version State
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1 Active 3c13.cc01.9480 15 V02 Ready
2 Standby 802d.bfda.7ce0 13 V02 Ready
Channel group 1
Dual-Active Partner Partner Partner
Port Detect Capable Name Port Version
Hu1/0/27 No None None N/A
Hu1/0/28 No None None N/A
Hu2/0/27 Yes None None 1.1
Hu2/0/28 No None None N/A
No idea why the port channel wont come up as I have followed this https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst9500/software/release/16-12/configuration_guide/ha/b_1612_ha_9500_cg/configuring_cisco_stackwise_virtual.html#concept_ad5_4wx_31b
Regards
Scott
08-17-2020 05:28 AM
Hello,
make sure you are not running into any of the restrictions mentioned in the link below:
The output you have posted is truncated, make sure it looks like below:
Switch 1
interface port-channel 1
stackwise-virtual
domain 1
dual-active detection pagp trust channel-group 1
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/25
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/26
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/27
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
!
interface HundredGigE1/0/28
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
Switch 2
interface port-channel 1
stackwise-virtual
domain 1
dual-active detection pagp trust channel-group 1
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/25
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/26
stackwise-virtual link 1
description stackwise-virtual link
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/27
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
!
interface HundredGigE2/0/28
description stackwise-dad
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
I assume you have reloaded both switches after configuring SVL and DAD ?
08-17-2020 06:09 AM
Unfortunately seems to go from bad to worse !.
extract from show run
stackwise-virtual
domain 1
dual-active detection pagp trust channel-group 1
interface Port-channel1
no ip address
interface HundredGigE1/0/27
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
interface HundredGigE2/0/27
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode desirable
- from show interface status
Hu1/0/27 suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu2/0/27 suspended routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Po1 notconnect routed auto auto N/A
- from show log
%ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL1: Hu1/0/27 suspended: PAgP not enabled on the remote port.
%ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL1: Hu2/0/27 suspended: PAgP not enabled on the remote port.
I have tried reloading the entire stack - still the same.
I am starting to think that there is either a license problem or a bug that doesnt allow for pagp port channels.
Details of license and version (just in case)
Technology-package Technology-package
Current Type Next reboot
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
network-advantage Smart License network-advantage
dna-advantage Subscription Smart License dna-advantage
Cisco IOS XE Software, Version 16.09.05
Cisco IOS Software [Fuji], Catalyst L3 Switch Software (CAT9K_IOSXE), Version 16.9.5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
08-17-2020 06:36 AM
Hello,
weird indeed. Can you try LACP ?
08-17-2020 06:44 AM
Yup - Works fine
Hu1/0/28 connected routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Hu2/0/28 connected routed full 10G CVR QSFP SFP10G(SFP-10GBase-SR)
Po2 connected routed a-full a-10G N/A
interface HundredGigE1/0/28
no ip address
channel-group 2 mode on
end
interface HundredGigE2/0/28
no ip address
channel-group 2 mode on
end
Port-channel2 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is EtherChannel, address is 3c13.cc01.9501 (bia 3c13.cc01.9501)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 20000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 10Gb/s, link type is auto, media type is N/A
input flow-control is on, output flow-control is unsupported
Members in this channel: Hu1/0/28 Hu2/0/28
08-17-2020 07:24 AM
Hello,
I checked for bugs, none found. It does definitely sound like one. Weird that it doesn't work with PAgP, which is Cisco-proprietary, but is does with the open standard LACP.
If you have a support contract, you could raise a TAC case to report this is a bug.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide