01-08-2008 07:57 PM - edited 03-05-2019 08:21 PM
Hi,
I have 1 windows XP workstation connecting 2 switches on separate network.
Let call the 2 switches - Switch 1 & switch 2
I found that bpdu packet has been porpagate from switch 1 to switch 2 through my windows xp workstation.
My windows XP workstation IP address,
NIC 1
IP :192.168.7.1
Subnet : 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.7.254
NIC2
IP : 10.3.1.100
Subnet: 255.255.255.240
Gateway : none
In this case, any idea on how to prevent spanning-tree protocol (bpdu) porpogate from switch 1 to Switch 2 thorugh my windows XP workstation?
Thks in advance.
Regards,
Steven
01-08-2008 08:02 PM
Hi Steven,
Can you confirm the port on switch 1 an switch 2 on which your nic cards are connected are in seperate vlan or same vlan?
Regards,
Ankur
01-08-2008 08:53 PM
Hi Ankur,
The 2 switches are in separate network. Physically there is not any connection between this 2 switches. This 2 switches connect to each other only through the windows XP workstation.
Workstation NIC 1 connect to switch 1 in vlan 7, NIC 2 connect to switch 2 in vlan 5
Port config for Switch 1,
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/2
switchport access vlan 7
switchport mode access
storm-control broadcast level 5.00
storm-control action trap
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
!
Port Config for Switch 2,
interface GigabitEthernet1/48
switchport
switchport access vlan 5
switchport mode access
no ip address
storm-control broadcast level 5.00
no cdp enable
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
end
regards,
Steven
01-08-2008 09:01 PM
strange that bpdu is propagating..
now 4rm config ,portfast and bpdu guard doent prevent sending bpdus..u must configure bpdu filter for the same..
and also doesnt ur sw's creating any problem when its receiving bpdu's as u have configured both portfast and bpduguard??
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide