cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
3445
Views
10
Helpful
29
Replies

Troubleshooting - HTTP/HTTPS not accessible on the network

joe_chris
Level 1
Level 1

image.png

PC A is trying to access Server B web server. WAN is Metro Ethernet with 1ms latency.

  1. PING from A to B OK
  2. TRACEROUTE from A to B OK
  3. SSH from A to B OK
  4. HTTP/HTTPS from A to B NO RESPONSE

From the WireShark capture, Server B tries to reach PC A after exhausting retries. Any obvious issue with the network?

 

29 Replies 29

Hi joe_chris!

I am sending from mobile, so i can't open pcap file but as soon i come on the work i will do... 

Like i told you previous have you did this test also " When you are on the server, can you use webbrowser and access the webserver, efter that please post the wireshark? "

Can you please send " show interfaces" on those interfaces that pc connected and the server?

 

Zanthra, i did not agree with you the mtu size, this is just fine and don,t need decrease. I would say The link between sites is just good as it could!

 

Thanks

 

/Mohammed

Hi Mohammed,

 

Thanks for checking the PCAP files.

 

I cannot run a web browser on the server itself. However please find the PCAP file captured from the server interface, i.e. from the server perspective so you can crosscheck with previous PCAP files. I have included both HTTPS and SSH for comparison.

 

Will get back to you on 'show interface'. 

Here is the SSH PCAP file on the server.

Hi Zanthra,

 

Thanks for the insight. I will test using lower MTU size to see if it makes any difference.

Hello,

 

on a side note, the problem might as well be the L2 WAN link. How is this configured ? Can you post the output of 'show interfaces x' of the two interface that connect both sites ?

Hi Georg,

 

Basically the port is connected to the CPE switch by provider. There is one switch at each end. The switch carries different L2 network from Site A to Site B, e.g. port 1 is L2 network 1, port 2 is L2 network 2 etc.

 

Note that I've removed the actual interface number. 

 

Site A

GigabitEthernetx/y is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet Port, address is 2894.0fc6.3bd9 (bia 2894.0fc6.3bd9)
Description: 
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 3/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, link type is auto, media type is 10/100/1000-TX
input flow-control is on, output flow-control is on
Auto-MDIX on (operational: on)
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:04, output never, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 840000 bits/sec, 1190 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 12688000 bits/sec, 1662 packets/sec
25014879428 packets input, 6840670406116 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 202383839 broadcasts (57384203 multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
38918159560 packets output, 45904476975531 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

 

Site B

GigabitEthernety/z is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet Port, address is 2894.0fc6.3cc8 (bia 2894.0fc6.3cc8)
Description: 
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 3/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, link type is auto, media type is 10/100/1000-TX
input flow-control is on, output flow-control is on
Auto-MDIX on (operational: on)
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:00, output never, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 11990000 bits/sec, 1611 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 862000 bits/sec, 1198 packets/sec
32406759005 packets input, 39711848191204 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 887560244 broadcasts (438536781 multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
20891977179 packets output, 5250509294585 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Hello,

 

no errors on the interfaces, so the line looks good actually.

I think it has been mentioned before in this thread that MTU could be a problem. Try and do a simple ping test from your Site A to Site B clients with the DF bit set, and try different packet sizes until you get the below result. That will tell you the maximum MTU size your link supports:

 

ping -f -l 1400 8.8.8.8

Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 1400 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=1400 time=10ms TTL=58
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=1400 time=11ms TTL=58
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=1400 time=16ms TTL=58
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=1400 time=14ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 12ms

 

ping -f -l 1500 8.8.8.8

Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 1500 bytes of data:
Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.
Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.
Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.
Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.

Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

Thanks Georg. Will update the result.

Hi joe_chris!

On the time when the server is checking certificate. On that time there is something happning, i don´t know if this is related MTU size. You do have some kind of problem tcp Dup ACK, as i told you before. The server and the pc is not communicating well, we see on the server alot TCP Retransmission without any response. 

 

Have you tested same vlans on the PC and Server? take wireshark and post it? It is look like som packet is lost in somewhere, i don´t know where they are lost.... 

The server is sending 1460 byte TCP data plus (IP header and TCP header which is total 54 bytes) = 1514 bytes which is ok to run: 

se the pictures: 

 

/Mohammed 

 

The duplicate ACK is related to TCP Fast Retransmit. When the client receives the 80 byte "Server Hello Done" ahead of the previous sequence number, it solicits a duplicate ACK to help identify the previous segment as potentially lost.

 

Something is silently eating full sized packets on the path or blocking the ICMP error messages, because if the server received an ICMP message about packets being too large it would reduce the MTU itself.

 

Joe_chris, can you contact the WAN provider and check with them what the maximum frame size is? VLAN tags add 4 bytes to an already 1514 byte frame to bring it up to 1518 which could be larger than they allow. (or +4 more bytes with FCS)

Hi Zanthra,

 

While waiting for the WAN provider to get back, here is the output with this tool.

https://www.elifulkerson.com/projects/mturoute.php

 

See if that helps.

 

Hi Mohammed,

 

I did tested the PC and server on the same VLAN. There was no issue at all. 

 

 

Thanks.

Hi Georg,

 

Please find the PING -f output.

 

 

If the MTU is 1496 that means that your WAN links will take the normal 1500 byte frames as long as they don't have the extra 4 byte VLAN tag. Here are a few possible solutions.

 

1) Make sure all hosts including router interfaces on all VLANs that cross the WAN link are configured with the 1496 byte MTU.

2) Remove the VLAN tagging and use a different port on the CPE for each VLAN.

3) Reorganize the network so that the VLANs don't cross the WAN link, and instead have hosts at site 2 use a local router to route traffic to site 1 as needed.

Hi Zanthra,

 

We solved the issue by increasing the WAN link MTU to 1600.

 

Thanks everyone for your help!!

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card