03-11-2012 11:33 PM - edited 03-07-2019 05:30 AM
We have a pair of N7K distribution switches connected to a pair of N7K Aggregation switches.
We run vPC on both pairs of n7k's.
n7k-d1 has two interfaces in a Port-Channel connecting to n7k-a1 & n7k-a2. (PC1)
n7k-d2 also has two interfaces in a Port-Channel connecting to n7k-a1 & n7k-a2. (PC2)
My problem is that Spanning-Tree is blocking PC2 and all traffic from n7k-d2 is traversing the Peer-Link before reaching the Aggregation layer.
Can anyone tell me if this is the best design for connecting two pairs of n7k's with vPC or if a better design would be to connect all 4 links into the same Port-Channel and vPC?
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-12-2012 06:38 AM
Hi,
The same principles apply since both a N7K and a N5K run Nexus OS.Therefore they both support vPC.
That document that I referred you to was written by a Cisco employee.
See also this Cisco best practice document for double sided VPC:
My guess is that both docs shows a N7K connecting to a N5K since deploying multiple N7K's in a data centre is very expensive unless you have a good business case. Rather most organisations choose to deploy the cheaper architecture of a N7K connecting to a N5K. Hence this cheaper option is discussed.
Hope that helps.
Cheers
Sean
03-13-2012 09:32 AM
Hi Henry
Same back-to-back vpc design is supported between pairs of n7k and n5k devices. There shouldn't be any issues.
HTH,
Alex
03-19-2012 04:58 AM
Hi Henry
Happy that you have found answers to your questions.
Regards,
Alex
03-12-2012 01:39 AM
Hi,
Check out this document on single-sided vs double-sided vpc.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20836
Don't forget to rate all posts that are helpful.
03-12-2012 04:20 AM
Thanks.
I see this option is for n7k to n5k.
Is this option also available for n7k to n7k and is this a Cisco Best Practice recommendation?
03-12-2012 06:38 AM
Hi,
The same principles apply since both a N7K and a N5K run Nexus OS.Therefore they both support vPC.
That document that I referred you to was written by a Cisco employee.
See also this Cisco best practice document for double sided VPC:
My guess is that both docs shows a N7K connecting to a N5K since deploying multiple N7K's in a data centre is very expensive unless you have a good business case. Rather most organisations choose to deploy the cheaper architecture of a N7K connecting to a N5K. Hence this cheaper option is discussed.
Hope that helps.
Cheers
Sean
03-12-2012 08:22 AM
Thanks Sean.
We have the Duoble-sided vPC concept between the N7k Distributions and the N5k Access switches.
Just need to verify that we can run the same between the Aggregate and Distribution.
I know the N5k's had some Caveats around the connectivity from the Servers regarding dual-homing.
Need some confirmation that similar Caveats don't exist with this design.
03-13-2012 09:32 AM
Hi Henry
Same back-to-back vpc design is supported between pairs of n7k and n5k devices. There shouldn't be any issues.
HTH,
Alex
03-18-2012 10:39 AM
Thanks Guys.
Had a Chat with our Cisco Rep and he also agrees that the Double-Sided vPC is the correct design between our n7K Core and n7K Distribution switches.
03-19-2012 04:58 AM
Hi Henry
Happy that you have found answers to your questions.
Regards,
Alex
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide