02-04-2016 10:31 AM - edited 03-01-2019 12:34 PM
How many of you have a UCS with both production and DMZ systems on it (same blades as well)?
The question has come up at work several times. I, being more security focused, about had a cow. But I want to know what others are doing and how you are assured one side can not see the other before I fly off the handle ;)
We do not currently have the vASA or NSX.
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-04-2016 09:33 PM
Hi Chad
Yes I have customers doing it; disjoint vlans is the design they use.
Another (better) solution would be to use a dedicated UCS domain for DMZ. mini UCS is a nice solution, and with 3.1 a second chassis is supported, therefore a total ot 16 blades.
Walter.
02-04-2016 09:33 PM
Hi Chad
Yes I have customers doing it; disjoint vlans is the design they use.
Another (better) solution would be to use a dedicated UCS domain for DMZ. mini UCS is a nice solution, and with 3.1 a second chassis is supported, therefore a total ot 16 blades.
Walter.
02-05-2016 01:15 AM
I have seen it throughout most of the customers environments.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/data-center-virtualization/unified-computing/white_paper_c11-692008.html
As Walter stated with the new release of software 3.1 we might be seeing an influx of people trying to add the second Chassis to the UCS mini but I haven't seen anyone do that yet.
Hope that helps.
Qiese Dides
02-05-2016 06:59 AM
Thanks to both of you!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide