Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Here is the issue.Anyconnect connects and functions as intended for the split tunnel with a destination of 192.168.166.0/24 It does not work for 192.168.55.4 /30. The configuration is the same for both. I have static no nat statements and interest...
Has anybody created the High and Low level designs for the NASP? This is my first time and its always easier to have a template to work off of than to reinvent the wheel. An incomplete example is displayed below but I was hoping someone had a comple...
I know that 4.2 is pretty old but it could be relevant in future versions with 5.3 and ISE. I dont know. Topic: Implementing (permitting) subcommands under an Authorization Set.This was somehwat difficult for me to get working for the final step t...
I have been struggling with this for the past few days and have made very little headway. I have both sides configured and they are identical in regards to the tunnel. It appears that phase 1 is not completing. I will submit the configs first and ...
DISCLAIMER**** (lol)OK so in our shop we dont do a lot of redesign so Im having a really hard time with this. Its been a while. Most of the changes we make are firewall changes and trunking. Im having a huge brainfart on thsi.To the point: I am t...
Wanted to follow up on the solution.The issue is the following: management-access Inside-166That command allows me access the 192.168.166.1 address for management purposes but the 55.5 address is not accessible. If I change the management access com...
I think a more detailed answer here is required. Lets go back to the basics of vlan tags and what the end devices knows. Imagine the g 0/1 is used by a laptop. That laptop has no clue as to what vlan it is on. Wjy? The switch never notifies it o...
I think you best option is to listen to tporembski. He said that fa0 is not routeable. Try using a different port on the 3560x and see if that suits you better.
I think you best option is to listen to tporembski. He said that fa0 is not routeable. Try using a different port on the 3560x and see if that suits you better.
