Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About emiliano.eusebio
Stats
Member since
12-09-2004
14
Posts
0
Helpful
0
Solutions
Created by
emiliano.eusebi
in XR OS and Platforms
in XR OS and Platforms
01-25-2017
06:49 AM
01-25-2017
06:49 AM
Hi Experts,
We have a customer with a lot of ASR9010 with the V1 chassis, and they want to migrate the RSP-4G to the RSP-880, but I have a doubt about if we also must change the PEMv1 to the PEMv2 or PEMv3.
I tried to search for some information about the power supply that are supported by the RSP880 and the V1 is not mentioned, so I don't know if they are supported or not.
I'm noticed that the Tomahawk LC's only support the v2 and v3 PEMs, and as the RSP880 is launched to support the TH LC, I will assume that the RSP880 also needs the v2 and v3 PEMs, but I need a confirmation.
Thanks a Lot
Emiliano
... View more
Labels:
Created by
emiliano.eusebi
in Service Providers Blogs
06-30-2016
02:36 PM
06-30-2016
02:36 PM
Hi Xanders, thank you very much for the clarification! and thank you for be active in the forum!!
Best Regards!
Emiliano
... View more
06-30-2016
04:58 AM
Hi Xander,
I need to know if I'll use an ASR9K as BNG (we have the BNG licenses!) and I want to use PWHE, I'll need some VRF license (iVRF or AIP)?
As I know the RP don't use license for VRF. But I have some doubts about the PWHE implementation.
Thanks a Lot
... View more
10-29-2014
07:00 AM
Hi Marek, If you want to keep the original VLAN ID, so you must to use the following configuration; ! interface GigabitEthernet0/6 no ip address loopback driver negotiation auto no keepalive service instance 5 ethernet encapsulation dot1q 5 rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric xconnect 192.168.201.6 123 encapsulation mpls pw-class TEST ! pseudowire-class TEST encapsulation mpls interworking vlan So with this you change the mode of the VC TYPE (default is type 5 (port-mode)) to 4 that is vlan mode ASR901-1#sh mpls l2transport binding Destination Address: 192.168.201.6,VC ID: 123 Local Label: 25 Cbit: 1, VC Type: Eth VLAN, GroupID: 0 MTU: 9216, Interface Desc: n/a VCCV: CC Type: RA [2] CV Type: LSPV [2] Remote Label: 27 Cbit: 1, VC Type: Eth VLAN, GroupID: 0 MTU: 9216, Interface Desc: n/a VCCV: CC Type: RA [2] CV Type: LSPV [2] Please try with this configuration and let me know if this works for you. Best Regards Emiliano
... View more
10-27-2014
06:13 PM
Hi Marek,
I think that you need to delimit the EFP with an encapsulation, if you want to add a full port, Port-Based EoMPLS you must do it without an EFP:
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/11
description CE_facing
xconnect 111.0.1.1 501 encapsulation mpls
!
But if you need to delimit the service, you need to add an service instance attached to an encapsulation (default or with the vlan 2100)
The configuration must look like that you show in your description:
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/11
description CE_facing
service instance 2100 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 2100
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
xconnect 111.0.1.1 501 encapsulation mpls
!
Remember that the encapsulation is the only way to identify the "traffic" inside of the interface.
Encapsulation
Encapsulation defines the matching criteria that maps a VLAN, a range of VLANs, Ethertype, or a combination of these to a service instance. Configure encapsulation in the service instance configuration mode. You must configure one encapsulation command per EFP (service instance)
Take a look to the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/asr_901/Configuration/Guide/b_asr901-scg/b_asr901-scg_chapter_01111.html#con_1084502
and
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/asr_901/Configuration/Guide/b_asr901-scg/b_asr901-scg_chapter_01000.html
Best Regards
Emiliano
... View more
Created by
emiliano.eusebi
in XR OS and Platforms
05-28-2014
05:53 AM
05-28-2014
05:53 AM
Hi Xander, I had some time to make additional troubleshooting: Basically the main reason why the 2m signal is not selected, is because the ANUE don't generate 2,048Khz and only generate 2,000Khz (the ANUE gives the option of generate the 2Mhz signal dividing the original 10Mhz by 5), so with this big difference of frequency, the signal is not eligible for the synchronization. There is a big difference between 2Mhz and 2,048Khz. Maybe if we are talking in networking environment we know that the 1M or the 1,024K is the same, but in frequency is another thing. Also I've checked that an E1 unframmed is not a pure 2m interface/signal valid to generate the sync signal in the Sync0 interface, this is because when you configure the interface as E1, also is attached an encoding (AMI or HDB3 so the signal travel like 0 and 1) and in the Sync0 (or Sync1) we need a pure 2,048Khz signal. Is the only way to bring UP the Sync0 configure as 2m (really 2,048Khz). So take in mind that the 2m configuration y the Sync0 or Sync1 must be a pure 2,048Khz signal, not an 2,000Khz (maybe derived from a 10Mhz signal, like the ANUE instrument do) I have a nice picture of my testing (see 20140526_161208.jpg) Pd: in the picture you can see the minimum frequency in which the ASR9K can get the "Locked" state Thanks a lot for your help, and I hope that this discussion can help to anyone Best Regards Emiliano
... View more
Created by
emiliano.eusebi
in XR OS and Platforms
05-26-2014
06:04 AM
05-26-2014
06:04 AM
Hi Xander, Definitely I have a signal problem in this case. As soon as I can, I will get an oscilloscope to graph what kind of signal I'm getting from the ANUE equipment. The configuration without SSM in this case don't cause any effect. I have tested with another signal of 2MHz and also is in state "Locked". So something bad is coming from ANUE. Just in case, an E1 interface "unframed" is the same as a 2MHz signal? (excuse me for my ignorance. Best Regards Emiliano
... View more
05-23-2014
08:00 AM
Hi Xander, Thanks for your concern and you help! Yesterday I made another test, in order to discard points of failure. I try to configure the Sync1 as output and generating a 2 Mhz signal. So I take this signal and loop with the Sync0 configured as I show you, input and 2 Mhz, and with this new signal, the Sync0 now is selected. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9K-BH#sh frequency synchronization selection Wed May 21 20:11:27.056 UTC Node 0/RSP0/CPU0: ============== Selection point: T0-SEL-B (2 inputs, 1 selected) Last programmed 00:00:18 ago, and selection made 00:00:13 ago Next selection points SPA scoped : None Node scoped : T4-SEL-C CHASSIS-TOD-SEL Chassis scoped: LC_TX_SELECT Router scoped : None Uses frequency selection Used for local line interface output S Input Last Selection Point QL Pri Status == ======================== ======================== ===== === =========== 1 Sync0 [0/RSP0/CPU0] n/a STU 1 Locked Internal0 [0/RSP0/CPU0] n/a ST3 255 Available RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9K-BH#sh frequency synchronization clock-interfaces Wed May 21 20:13:12.707 UTC Node 0/RSP0/CPU0: ============== Clock interface Sync0 (Up - BITS 2M) Assigned as input for selection Wait-to-restore time 1 minute SSM supported and enabled Input: Up Last received QL: None Effective QL: Opt-II,1/STU, Priority: 1, Time-of-day Priority 100 Supports frequency Output is disabled Next selection points: T0-SEL-B I think that I must have some problem about the quality of the 2 Mhz signal, maybe the signal is not so good or is attenuated, I must take and oscilloscope in order to see what kind of signal is received at the end of the coaxial wire. But also I don't think that in 2 Mhz signal the QL can be transmitted. One more time, thanks a lot for your help and dedication. Best regards Emiliano
... View more
05-22-2014
10:49 AM
Hi Xander! Excuse me for the delay, but I was to travel for other project, but now I'm with this issue again. I have used the link that you send me to configure this ASR9K as Grand Master, but now I'm trying to set the ASR9K to be synchronized from a 2 Mhz output (from an instrument called ANUE). The idea is (only to test all the possibilities in that the ASR9K can be configured) take the 2Mhz that the ANUE give us, and in base to this signal transport the frequency by PTP. The problem that I found is that the signal that come from the ANUE don't give us the QL, so the signal that ingress to the BITS Sync0 interface don't become valid and is seen as Unqualified. There are some outputs: RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9K-BH#sh frequency synchronization clock-interfaces Wed May 21 19:25:16.466 UTC Node 0/RSP0/CPU0: ============== Clock interface Sync0 (Up - BITS 2M) Assigned as input for selection Wait-to-restore time 1 minute SSM supported and enabled Input: Up Last received QL: None Effective QL: Opt-II,2/STU, Priority: 1, Time-of-day Priority 100 Supports frequency Output is disabled Next selection points: T0-SEL-B RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9K-BH#sh frequency synchronization selection Wed May 21 19:25:12.798 UTC Node 0/RSP0/CPU0: ============== Selection point: T0-SEL-B (2 inputs, 1 selected) Last programmed 04:03:19 ago, and selection made 04:03:19 ago Next selection points SPA scoped : None Node scoped : T4-SEL-C CHASSIS-TOD-SEL Chassis scoped: LC_TX_SELECT Router scoped : None Uses frequency selection Used for local line interface output S Input Last Selection Point QL Pri Status == ======================== ======================== ===== === =========== 1 Internal0 [0/RSP0/CPU0] n/a ST3E 255 Holdover Sync0 [0/RSP0/CPU0] n/a STU 1 Unqualified I think that because I don't receive the QL, the Sync0 is not selected. The configuration that I have is this: ptp clock domain 4 priority1 100 ! profile MASTER transport ipv4 sync frequency 64 clock operation two-step announce frequency 16 delay-request frequency 64 ! clock-selection telecom-profile clock-advertisement telecom-profile ! frequency synchronization quality itu-t option 2 generation 2 clock-interface timing-mode system log selection changes ! clock-interface sync 0 location 0/RSP0/CPU0 port-parameters bits-input 2m ! frequency synchronization selection input priority 1 wait-to-restore 1 quality receive lowest itu-t option 2 generation 2 SMC ! ! I try to change the type of Option and Generation without success, also I tried with the Sync0 configured as E1 (here in Argentina, we use E1 instead of T1) also provided by the ANUE, and in this case we can work perfectly, also setting the correct QL to the E1 signal. But in the case of the 2Mhz I can't set any related to the QL in the ANUE, and also in the ASR9K. Is some way to override the QL that comes from the 2Mhz signal? Thanks a Lot again! Emiliano
... View more
Created by
emiliano.eusebi
in XR OS and Platforms
04-28-2014
05:04 AM
04-28-2014
05:04 AM
Hi to all, I need to synchronize an ASR9K with a Symmetricom TP5000 Grand Master, for this I have a 2Mhz signal, incoming in the BITS input of the RSP440. The problem that I found is that the Sync0 input appears as "Unqualified" and I don't know how to make or which parameter I can change in order to get the "Locked" status: RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9K-BH(config-freqsync)#do show frequency synchronization clo$ Sun Apr 27 13:34:27.286 UTC Flags: > - Up D - Down S - Assigned for selection d - SSM Disabled s - Output squelched L - Looped back Node 0/RSP0/CPU0: ============== Fl Clock Interface QLrcv QLuse Pri QLsnd Output driven by ===== =================== ====== ====== === ====== ======================== >S Sync0 None STU 1 n/a n/a D Sync1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a D Sync2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a >S Internal0 n/a ST3E 255 n/a n/a RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9K-BH(config-freqsync)#do sh fre syn selection Sun Apr 27 13:34:36.721 UTC Node 0/RSP0/CPU0: ============== Selection point: T0-SEL-B (2 inputs, 1 selected) Last programmed 3d15h ago, and selection made 00:00:43 ago Next selection points SPA scoped : None Node scoped : T4-SEL-C CHASSIS-TOD-SEL Chassis scoped: LC_TX_SELECT Router scoped : None Uses frequency selection Used for local line interface output S Input Last Selection Point QL Pri Status == ======================== ======================== ===== === =========== 1 Internal0 [0/RSP0/CPU0] n/a ST3E 255 Holdover Sync0 [0/RSP0/CPU0] n/a STU 1 Unqualified Selection point: T4-SEL-A (0 inputs, 0 selected) Last programmed 1w4d ago, and selection made 00:00:43 ago Next selection points SPA scoped : None Node scoped : T4-SEL-C Chassis scoped: None Router scoped : None This is the configuration that I made: RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9K-BH#sh run frequency synchronization Sun Apr 27 13:39:57.686 UTC frequency synchronization quality itu-t option 2 generation 2 log selection changes ! I don't know if exist some way to test o to know if the signal that is comming into the BITS input is good to permit the synchronize in this way. Any help or documentation to understand this will be appreciated Thanks a Lot Emiliano
... View more
Labels:
01-10-2014
04:32 AM
Hi to All, I have a doubt about the possible difference between the xconnect with encapsulation default and the xconnect in port mode, is the same thing? Is one better than other? which is the correct implementation and configuration of the xconnect port mode? Here is my configuration: ASR901-3#sh run inter giga 0/5 Building configuration... Current configuration : 236 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet0/5 no ip address loopback driver negotiation auto no keepalive service instance 1 ethernet encapsulation default xconnect 192.168.201.4 123 encapsulation mpls ! end Jan 10 17:52:47.338: AToM LDP[192.168.201.4]: Sending notif msg Jan 10 17:52:47.338: AToM LDP[192.168.201.4]: Sending notif msg vc type 5 , cbit 1, Jan 10 17:52:47.338: AToM LDP[192.168.201.4]: , vc id 123, Jan 10 17:52:47.338: AToM LDP[192.168.201.4]: group id 0, vc label 29, Jan 10 17:52:47.338: AToM LDP[192.168.201.4]: status 0x7/LDP 0x1/ADJ 0x0, Jan 10 17:52:47.338: AToM LDP[192.168.201.4]: mtu 9216, vc handle 0xF2000007 Jan 10 17:52:47.338: AToM LDP[192.168.201.4]: VCCV CC 0x2, CV 0x2 ASR901-3#sh mpls l2 vc 123 detail Local interface: Gi0/5 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up Destination address: 192.168.201.4, VC ID: 123, VC status: up Output interface: Vl10, imposed label stack {20 25} Preferred path: not configured Default path: active Next hop: 192.168.201.242 Create time: 00:05:20, last status change time: 00:00:32 Last label FSM state change time: 00:04:02 Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 192.168.201.4:0 up Targeted Hello: 192.168.201.6(LDP Id) -> 192.168.201.4, LDP is UP Graceful restart: not configured and not enabled Non stop routing: not configured and not enabled Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported LDP route watch : enabled Label/status state machine : established, LruRru Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault Last local PW i/f circ status rcvd: No fault Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault MPLS VC labels: local 29, remote 25 Group ID: local 0, remote 0 MTU: local 9216, remote 9216 Remote interface description: Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On (configured: autosense) Dataplane: SSM segment/switch IDs: 12300/8203 (used), PWID: 4 VC statistics: transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0 transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0 transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0 ASR901-3# the other side: ASR901-1#sh run inter giga 0/6 Building configuration... Current configuration : 147 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet0/6 no ip address loopback driver negotiation auto no keepalive xconnect 192.168.201.6 123 encapsulation mpls end Jan 11 18:49:01.934: AToM LDP[192.168.201.6]: Sending notif msg Jan 11 18:49:01.934: AToM LDP[192.168.201.6]: Sending notif msg vc type 5 , cbit 1, Jan 11 18:49:01.934: AToM LDP[192.168.201.6]: , vc id 123, Jan 11 18:49:01.934: AToM LDP[192.168.201.6]: group id 0, vc label 25, Jan 11 18:49:01.934: AToM LDP[192.168.201.6]: status 0x7/LDP 0x1/ADJ 0x0, Jan 11 18:49:01.934: AToM LDP[192.168.201.6]: mtu 9216, vc handle 0xAD000001 Jan 11 18:49:01.934: AToM LDP[192.168.201.6]: VCCV CC 0x2, CV 0x2 ASR901-1#sh mpls l2 vc 123 det Local interface: Gi0/6 up, line protocol up, Ethernet up Destination address: 192.168.201.6, VC ID: 123, VC status: up Output interface: Vl10, imposed label stack {18 29} Preferred path: not configured Default path: active Next hop: 192.168.201.246 Create time: 00:19:47, last status change time: 00:16:16 Last label FSM state change time: 00:19:46 Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 192.168.201.6:0 up Targeted Hello: 192.168.201.4(LDP Id) -> 192.168.201.6, LDP is UP Graceful restart: not configured and not enabled Non stop routing: not configured and not enabled Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported LDP route watch : enabled Label/status state machine : established, LruRru Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault Last local PW i/f circ status rcvd: No fault Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault MPLS VC labels: local 25, remote 29 Group ID: local 0, remote 0 MTU: local 9216, remote 9216 Remote interface description: Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On (configured: autosense) Dataplane: SSM segment/switch IDs: 4097/4096 (used), PWID: 1 VC statistics: transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0 transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0 transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0 ASR901-1# In both cases the loopback driver is configured because I don't have these ports connected to anything. But this no matter at this point. The thing is that I have two ways to configure the same thing, but i don't know which is the correct. Thanks a Lot Emiliano
... View more
Labels:
09-16-2010
08:35 AM
Hi, Can someone explain me which is the difference in configure the conf-reg value in 0x102 or 0x2102? Thanks a Lot Emiliano
... View more
Labels:
06-29-2009
06:30 AM
Hi, I have a customer that have 3 routers 7600, and the behavior of mls cef is different in the 3 boxes. In one of this boxes they have one BGP full routing in ipv4 and another full BGP in one VRF, and they have this: sh mls cef summ Total routes: 864164 IPv4 unicast routes: 562910 IPv4 Multicast routes: 3 MPLS routes: 301249 IPv6 unicast routes: 2 IPv6 multicast routes: 0 EoM routes: 0 sh mls cef maximum-routes FIB TCAM maximum routes : ======================= Current :- ------- IPv4 - 550k MPLS - 372k IPv6 + IP Multicast - 48k (default) User configured :- --------------- IPv4 - 606k MPLS - 333k IPv6 + IP multicast - 40k (default) Upon reboot :- ----------- IPv4 - 550k MPLS - 372k IPv6 + IP multicast - 48k (default) Recently our customer change the configuration in order to gain some space in the hardware, but I need help to understand how to predict the amount of mls entries that the box can reach (the max is 1007000 hardware entries, they have 3BXL) in special to know if our customer must change this box for another one, like a CRS-1 or GSR. Thanks a Lot for your help
... View more
Labels:
01-25-2017
Hi Experts, We have a customer with a lot of ASR9010 with the V1
chassis, and they want to migrate t...
06-30-2016
Hi Xanders, thank you very much for the clarification! and thank you for
be active in the forum!! Be...
06-30-2016
Hi Xander, I need to know if I'll use an ASR9K as BNG (we have the BNG
licenses!) and I want to use ...
10-29-2014
Hi Marek,If you want to keep the original VLAN ID, so you must to use
the following configuration;!i...
10-27-2014
Hi Marek, I think that you need to delimit the EFP with an
encapsulation, if you want to add a full ...
05-28-2014
Hi Xander,I had some time to make additional troubleshooting:Basically
the main reason why the 2m si...
05-26-2014
Hi Xander,Definitely I have a signal problem in this case. As soon as I
can, I will get an oscillosc...
05-23-2014
Hi Xander,Thanks for your concern and you help!Yesterday I made another
test, in order to discard po...
05-22-2014
Hi Xander!Excuse me for the delay, but I was to travel for other
project, but now I'm with this issu...
Created by
emiliano.eusebio
in XR OS and Platforms
04-28-2014
04-28-2014
Hi to all,I need to synchronize an ASR9K with a Symmetricom TP5000 Grand
Master, for this I have a 2...
Created by
emiliano.eusebio
in MPLS
01-13-2014
01-13-2014
Hi Akash,Thanks for your clarification!Best RegardsEmiliano
Created by
emiliano.eusebio
in MPLS
01-10-2014
01-10-2014
Hi to All,I have a doubt about the possible difference between the
xconnect with encapsulation defau...
09-16-2010
Hi,Can someone explain me which is the difference in configure the
conf-reg value in 0x102 or 0x2102...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 12-09-2004 06:56 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 01-19-2018 12:16 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 14 |
