Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi all,I am trying to establish a site to site VPN with a far side. However, what i would like to do is to NAT the destination address. So let say the destination address is 10.1.2.x/24, I would like to nat it to 192.168.3.x/24. The reason being that...
Hi all,I have a Cisco 6509 with connections to multiple venues. Both destinations require that I NAT my internal network to their assigned IP. The problem is that one of their venue require one to one translation. When I do this, the host with the st...
I am currently running a site to site VPN on the ASA5510. It's a small shop and the ASA does most of the job as the switch is a dump switch. I would like to add a WAN link to the ASA and use it as a primary to the other site. The other site might ter...
Hi all,I am redistributing the site to site VPN static route into EIGRP but what I noticed on the 6509 when i do sh ip eigrp 200 topol, the static route from the ASA has "FD is inaccessible"6509 output:EIGRP-IPv4 Topology Table for AS(200)/ID(10.33.9...
I have a cisco ASA that provides vpn remote access to users. The pool address is 10.16.135.x. When a user (windows user) connects to the VPN, a route to 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 is added to the routing table. If the user private IP address is in the 10.x.x...
Anyone ever solved this issue? Cisco recommendation is not helpful as i am seeing this issue at another location and it is being reported on a Layer 2 uplink.
You might actually be right. I did check earlier and noticed that i am learning the same route from another eigrp process. I am going to inject a route that isn't in the routing table to see if this thing work. I will keep you posted
