Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi Experts, I am summarizing eigrp on a lan interface (gi0/0) attached to a router. Summary is 10.0.0.0/8. Gi0/0 IP is 10.1.1.1. Problem is that when the router uplink goes down and it looses all of the other 10.x routes, it is still advertising th...
Hi Experts,I have the below EEM configured. No. Class Type Event Type Trap Time Registered Name1 applet user track Off Mon Sep 8 20:33:19 2014 test track 1 state down maxrun 10.000 action 1.0 snmp-tr...
Hi Experts,Just wish to ask if I performed a tftp transfer from a CE in say Chicago (44 Meg WAN link) to a CE in say Malaysia (10Meg WAN link), is it correct to assume that BW traffic should show a significant increase in utilization given that traf...
Hi Experts,Just wish to ask if there is an option to retain the as-path information in eigrp when i redistribute from bgp to eigrp then to bgp?I recall coming across something similar to this before but I can't seem to remember it. Thanks in advance....
Hi Experts, Just wish to ask how do I find the actual port where a specific mac originated in a nexus environment with vpc and fex enabled?When I try to search for the port using:show mac address-table address xxxxxxI can't see the port it is origina...
Hi Jon, I have a lot of 10.x routes coming from the WAN into my edge CE router. I wish to limit the number of prefixes advertised into the LAN switches by summarizing. I have another standby CE also doing the same thing. I wish the primary CE to s...
Ah ok. I think I get it. I assumed it is dropped by default. So essentially to avoid the Private AS appearing on the path, best practice to apply the remove-private-as command or if dropping is preferred then a manual filter is required.Thanks Jon...
Hi Jon,I appreciate the response.Please see below link.http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080093f27.shtmlFrom my understanding of the above doc, the very reason the command "remove-private-as" was created was to overco...