About cjrchoi11

cjrchoi11 · ‎09-28-2015

I'm on the way migration the old 3845 to 4431 ISR and want to configure backup interface to achieve ethernet failover solution. I tested in the LAB that PSTN call via PRI MGCP and hardware conference via SCCP local conference bridge, PRI call and confernece both were survival with just couple seconds silence when pulled the primary interface, and also able to setup new PSTN call and conference using local conference bridge using backup interface. g0/0/0 is primary interface and associated to the MGCP/SCCP bind command, g0/0/1 is backup interface. My test tells not an issue the MGCP/SCCP behavior when the voice running with g0/0/1 which is backup interface. Any potential issue or considertion when the voice running by backup interface (g0/0/1) which is different from bind (g0/0/0) interface? I don't think an issue but just to double check. Thanks in advance, John

cjrchoi11 · ‎09-14-2012

Hi, Here my screnario, -two agents (agent1 and agent2), agent1 handles call from US only and agent2 for a call from Canada only -many applications (applications have unique DNIS) and assigned skill set per agent -in the case both agents (agent1 and agent2) have skill set on a specific application and callers dials to the specific application, >a call from US, should routing to agent1 >a call from Canda, should routing to agent2 To achieve this, I need lookup two things that calling number area code and agent'skill set. I can create skill set for area codes and applications, and create CSQs to contain both skill sets. Ex, csq_us_appl1, csq_ca_appl1,,,,, if I have 50 applicaitons, I need 100 CSQs,,, concern is too many CSQs with this approcah,,, Advise please to resovle the issue, Thanks, John

cjrchoi11 · ‎04-02-2012

Hi, I have CUBE15.1.3 and configured dial-peer, -to/from CUCM, "dtmf-relay sip-kpml rtp-nte" -to/from ITSP, "dtmf-relay rtp-nte" -CUCM SIP Trunk for CUBE=OOB and RFC2833 I have couple UC applications attached to CUCM8.5 which supporting KPML and RFC2833 depends on the application type, works okay the DTMF mechanism without MTP anchor which means no DTMF mismatch issue on CUCM. My concern is, as per PDI help desk, Cisco developer confirmed that CUBE is not supporting the DTMF conversion between KPML and RFC2833, nor road-map. I tested the DTMF conversion feature with the above configuration of CUBE and CUCM in the LAB without any problem (no MTP anchor) but wonder why its not supporting model on CUBE. Advise please,

cjrchoi11 · ‎11-03-2011

Hi, Is the Cius device able to setup Checkpoint VPN client? Thanks in advance,

cjrchoi11 · ‎10-05-2011

Hi, I don't have a real SAN device but want to practice the SAN behavior with UCS. Any free SAN simulator to attach to UCS? Thanks in advance,

cjrchoi11 · ‎09-23-2011

Thanks the advise but my concern is router filter specific. other components are straightforward and I can easily udpate on CSV file but the route filter csv format is kind of mess-up and difficult to formating from original number pattern,,, Advice please,

cjrchoi11 · ‎09-22-2011

because the link just explaining the dedication mode which is not support failover scenario. Anyone idea why not works active-active mode even okay with active-standy? BUG on C200-M2? Thanks in advance,

cjrchoi11 · ‎09-22-2011

Hi, I need more than 20 router filters each has two rules that area code and office code, and 20 entries to not exceed max 1024 characters. When I download the csv file, there are many fields and even truncate beause Excel limitation. Really painful to modifying the exported csv file. Any way to create many router filters with csv file? Thanks in advance,

cjrchoi11 · ‎09-19-2011

what about in the case two type of devices with sharded line in CUCM? physical IP Phone and CUPC device. always show the CSF device on CUxAC because it has priority the description field in alphanemeric order other than change the description field of SEPxxxx. As per TAC, need maual update all physical IP Phone MAC address on CUxAC. Any roadmap on this?

cjrchoi11 · ‎09-16-2011

Hi, I configured Etherchannel for C200-M2 and CIMC shared LOM with the redundancy mode, -active-active mode, when Etherchannel two switch ports UP, not reachable CIMC but okay ESXi and VMs. CIMC reachable if shutdown one of switch ports. -active-standby mode, not a problem Any idea why C200-M2 not reachable CIMC when the active-active redundancy mode? Thanks in advance,

cjrchoi11 · ‎09-13-2011

Thanks Vipul, resolved by installing latest device pack.

cjrchoi11 · ‎09-13-2011

Hi, As per Cius data sheet, it supports on CUCM8.5.1 and 8.6 but I cannot find a device option "Cisco Cius" on CUCM8.5.1 even I installed Cius COP file. How to configure Cius device on CUCM8.5.1.11900 (unrestricted)? Thanks in advance,

cjrchoi11 · ‎05-21-2011

CSCtq2246

cjrchoi11 · ‎04-26-2011

Let me update the situation from original posting 1. three video capable IP Phones are wroking fine ad-hoc video conference via CUCM media resource group by assigning MP as conference resource -this case, assigned 6 video ports to 'ad-hoc' 2. reservationless conference -assign all video ports (6) to 'scheduled'. No 'ad-hoc video port' at this time -from fist video capable IP Phone, dial MP pilot number and create a reservationless meeting and I can see video on the Phone -2nd video capable IP Phone, dial the MP pilot number and joining on the existing reservationless meeting. now both Phones show up video properly -3rd video capable IP Phone, joining the existing reservatioless meeting. now all IP Phone show up video properly -this scenario is reservationless meeting which is totally independent from WebEx scheduling and using MP 'scheduled' video ports 3. WebEx meeting -create a meeting from WebEx interface and disabled 'video' feature at this time. I know its not compatible bewteen WebEx and MP so should disable 'video' to utilize MP as video resource -from video capable IP Phone, dial MP pilot number and joining the existing meeting which created from WebEx interface -all three video capble IP Phones are works audio conference but no video show up Please advise whether #3 workable solution. Thanks, John

cjrchoi11 · ‎04-20-2011

Hi, I have MP8 and WebEx node, and Type 2 integation which means scheduling via WebEx interface. Environment) -three video capable IP Phones. 2*9951 and 1*9971 -IP Phones are working fine ad-hoc video conference via CUCM media resource group (MP8 as ad-hoc video conference) -Audio and Web confereence are working fine when scheduling via WebEx interface Problem) -on MP8, assigned all video ports (6) to 'scheduled' -configure all MP8 user profile including 'guest' to allow video conference 'call-in+host video conference. -create a scheudle on WebEx interface with disable 'video' to utilize MP8 as vedio resource -on three IP Phones, join to scheduled audio conference successfully but not anchoring video. -my expectation is, three IP Phones should participating video conference automatically because I allocated all video ports (6) to 'scheduled' Any idea why IP Phones cannot joining video conference? Thanks in advance,

Date Registered	‎04-04-2002 03:59 PM
Date Last Visited	‎08-18-2017 03:53 AM
Total Messages Posted	707
Total Helpful Votes Received	15

Any impact the MGCP/SCCP by configure b...

CCX8.5.1 - lookup CLID area code and ag...

CUBE15.1.3, DTMF conversion between KPM...

Cius - VPN client for checkpoint

UCS - free SAN simulator

CUCM8, router filter BAT

Re: C200-M2, shared LOM, active-active ...

CUCM8, router filter BAT

Re: CUEAC Phone status is "Out of servi...

C200-M2, shared LOM, active-active w/et...

CIUS on CUCM 8.5.1.11900

CIUS on CUCM 8.5.1.11900

Re: MP8 Type 2 - cannot joining video c...

Re: MP8 Type 2 - cannot joining video c...

MP8 Type 2 - cannot joining video confe...