08-08-2012 11:04 PM - edited 03-21-2019 06:08 AM
Ladies and gentlemen,
I'm in the middle of my first UC320W install this week. It's a greyfield scenario where the client has a Westell DSL router that both terminates the DSL connection and also provides the office Internet access via WLAN.
My plan (as per SMART design) is to add an SF200-24P to build out the voice network and also to extend the Data VLAN to the desktop via the phones' switchports. The Westell will continue to serve DHCP for the Data network (10.0.0.x) and the UC320W will serve for the Voice network (192.168.0.x).
To support those goals, I have thus far:
All my phones are registered and configured. When I plug in to the switch with my laptop I can hit the managment address of the switch and the Westell in via web browser but I can't hit the UC320W. In the UC320W I have the "Enable Remote Administration" box checked and I left it at the default port of 8080. Neither https://10.0.0.100:8008 or http://10.0.0.100 works from the "WAN"; however, if I plug my laptop directly into the back of the UC320W I can still access the administrative interface via http://10.0.0.100.
Is there a firewall in place somewhere that's keeping me from managing the UC320W from the Data network (WAN interface)?
Thanks in advance,
Phil
08-09-2012 07:24 AM
Phil,
You provided alot of information here and I am trying to visualize your topology.
Couple questions/comments:
1) If you connect a pc to the UC320W lan ports can you access the internet? That will confirm the default route via the WAN port is operating correctly.
2) If step 1 is succesful can you login to UC320 -> Services (upper right corner) -> Feedback-> Report Problems (drop down) -> Enter Attn Randy Bordner in the issues and suggestions field.
This will provide me the configuration of your UC320W.
Thanks,
Randy
08-09-2012 08:58 AM
Randy, I won't be returning to the customer site until tomorrow but I don't think I'm able to access the Internet from the LAN side of the UC320W.
Also, I've attached a super detailed Visio for your review.
08-09-2012 07:51 AM
Hi Phil,
A couple of comments to consider:
Hope this helps!
Chris
08-09-2012 09:16 AM
Chris, I'm not too worried about adding SPA8800s to this deployment but that IS a good tidbit of information to remember for future ones. I definitely haven't see any guidance on NOT using 192.168.x.x on the UC320W anywhere in the docs I've read thus far.
As for your second point, why can't I make the WAN port of the UC320W part of the Data VLAN? I don't think that would be out of the ordinary for a CME/SRST box so is there something different about how the UC320W handles LAN/WAN traffic? Unfortunately this site only has a handful of employees and haven't even thought about a DMZ. I guess I'll just have to carve one out...
Since I can't access the UC320W from the LAN via WAN port yet I haven't thought about accessing it via the Internet. That would be nice though
Thanks for the help, guys. If you can think of anything else that would be helpful I for my deployment I still have about 20 horus until I'm on-site again.
08-09-2012 02:15 PM
Phil,
One update on using 192.168.0.x network on any UC320W interfaces. I opened a defect on our documentation to highlight this point. Defect id CSCub54377.
Thanks, Randy
08-09-2012 09:36 PM
Great, thanks!
Also, I've been reading through the documentation for the DSL router my client has on-site and the configuration options are pretty limited when it comes to DMZ functionality. Looks like I'll have to get pretty creative to get their SMTP relay working...
08-09-2012 10:52 PM
Chris,
After some more thought I think the correct way to set this up would be to configure the Westell as a "dumb modem" to simply convert DSL to Ethernet and then use the UC320 to route both data and voice and proceed with the Greenfield Install steps.
In that case I should be able to factory reset the switch and then just reconfigure the UC320 to route both voice and data. Word on the street is the 200-series switch works "out of box" with the UC320 so I won't have to make any changes there other than the firmware upgrade.
I feel like this process will go much faster if I can just follow the Cisco Install Guides and documented solutions rather than having to beat my head on the wall figuring out how to make this Westell play nice with the Cisco gear...
Your thoughts?
08-10-2012 07:23 AM
Phil,
Yes, the 'UC320W routes voice and data' certainly much more easy to install and maintain. We have a large number of installs doing it this way.
Cheers,
Chris
08-10-2012 07:27 AM
08-10-2012 08:19 AM
Thanks Randy! Looking forward to knocking this out as soon as the firmware upgrade is complete.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide