Hello @palani2010
Local switching and central switching are two methods of handling data traffic in wireless networks, primarily determined by how and where the traffic is processed. In local switching, the access point AP directly forwards the client’s data traffic without sending it to a central controller. This is efficient for scenarios where devices need to access resources within the same local network, such as printers, file servers, or streaming services, as it minimizes latency and conserves bandwidth on the backhaul to the central controller. By keeping traffic local, local switching reduces the load on centralized infrastructure, making it ideal for high-bandwidth applications and environments where low latency is critical, like video streaming or voice communication. However, it relies on the AP to enforce security and QoS policies, which may limit centralized visibility and control.
Central switching, on the other hand, routes all data traffic from the AP to a central controller (e.g., WLC) before forwarding it to its final destination. This approach provides centralized management, enabling consistent enforcement of security policies, monitoring, and integration with advanced routing or security mechanisms like VPNs or firewalls. It is often preferred in enterprise networks or guest Wi-Fi setups where traffic must be inspected or routed through specific security appliances. While central switching offers enhanced control and monitoring, it can introduce higher latency and create bottlenecks if the controller is overloaded or the network backhaul is congested. The choice between the two depends on network requirements—local switching suits performance-driven, localized traffic, whereas central switching excels in controlled, security-focused environments.
Best regards
.ı|ı.ı|ı. If This Helps, Please Rate .ı|ı.ı|ı.
