04-08-2014 08:24 PM
Hello everyone
I have a couple of identical ASR-9001-S, can't get them to form a cluster, keep getting:
shelfmgr[406]: %PLATFORM-SHELFMGR_HAL-7-BOOT_REQ_FAILED : Invalid Boot Request from 0/RSP0/CPU0 rejected. Incompatible chassis types
IOS XR 5.1.1
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ironman0#admin show license
Tue Apr 8 19:14:21.283 UTC
FeatureID: ASR9000_DEMO (Slot based, Evaluation[Valid])
Total licenses 1
Available for use 1
Allocated to location 0
Active 0
Store name Permanent
Store index 1
Pool: Owner
Total licenses in pool: 1
Status: Available 1 Operational: 0
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ironman0#admin show license features
Tue Apr 8 19:14:26.390 UTC
Platform Feature ID:
A9K-iVRF-LIC
A9K-9001-AIP-LIC
A9K-9001-OPT-LIC
A9K-9001-VID-LIC
A9K-NVSAT1-LIC
A9K-NVSAT5-LIC
A9K-NVSAT20-LIC
A9K-NV-CLUSTR-LIC
A9K-BNG-LIC-8K
A9K-9001-MOB-LIC
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ironman0#show hw-module fpd location all
Tue Apr 8 19:26:33.099 UTC
===================================== ==========================================
Existing Field Programmable Devices
==========================================
HW Current SW Upg/
Location Card Type Version Type Subtype Inst Version Dng?
============ ======================== ======= ==== ======= ==== =========== ====
0/RSP0/CPU0 ASR9001-RP 1.0 lc fpga2 0 1.14 No
lc cbc 0 22.114 No
lc rommon 0 2.03 No
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0/FT0/SP ASR-9001-FAN 1.0 ft cbc 7 24.115 No
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0/0/CPU0 ASR9001-LC-S 1.0 lc cbc 0 23.114 No
lc fpga2 0 1.18 No
lc fpga4 0 2.10 No
lc rommon 0 2.03 No
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0/0/0 A9K-MPA-4X10GE 1.0 spa fpga6 0 1.06 No
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank you,
Regards,
Elnur
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-09-2014 05:17 AM
Hi Elnur,
We are actually working on putting out a troubleshooting note on this.
Here are the details.
Problem Description:
When booting up an ASR9K in a, Nv Edge (cluster) environment the following error message may be displayed and the boot process aborted.
mbi_val_process_packet: received repsonse (rack 1) Received do not boot message: [min ver: 00.00] reason 6 Don't boot reason: Incompatible chassis types MBI Validation aborted
There are three scenarios where we may see this 'Incompatible chassis types' error message.
Scenario 1 and 2 ONLY apply to the ASR-9001-S while scenario 3 applies to any ASR9K chassis.
1.
In this scenario there are two 9001-S chassis which are being clustered.
If one 9001-S has been upgraded to 120G but the second 9001-S is only running 60G then the incompatible chassis types error message will be displayed when booting the second router.
In order to fix the incompatibility make sure that both routers are upgraded (120G) or not upgraded (60G).
The command show license log operational can be used to check if the license is active.
In this example the 120G license is not operational. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9001#show license log operational #ID :SDR :FeatureID :NodeID :Time: Log 15 :Owner :A9K-9001-120G-LIC:0/RSP0/CPU0:Wed Oct 16 05:44:35 2013: license_acquire: opaque_string (null), result('License Manager' detected the 'warning' condition 'Licensed feature does not exist') In this example the 120G license is operational RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9001#show license log operational #ID :SDR :FeatureID :NodeID :Time: Log 1 :Owner :A9K-9001-120G-LIC:0/RSP0/CPU0:Sat Mar 15 00:22:09 2014: license_acquire: opaque_string (null), result(No error)
2.
In this scenario there are two 9001-S chassis in a cluster and neither chassis has been upgraded to 120G (see scenario 1 for verification).
The cause of this issue is the IML variable being incorrectly set to 1 in ROMMON. This variable should ONLY be set to 1 once the chassis is upgraded to 120G.
To resolve this issue set the IML variable to 0.
rommon B1 > IML=0 rommon B2 > sync rommon B3 > boot
3.
In this scenario two dissimilar chassis types are in a cluster.
ASR9K nV Edge does not allow dissimmilar chassis to form a cluster. During bootup the system will check the chassis type for the purpose of clustering capabilities. Any dissimilar combination can hit this issue, such as 9010 to 9922 or 9001 to 9006.
In order to verify the chassis type use the command admin show diag chassis eeprom-info in XR or the bpcookie command in ROMMON.
The below example shows the output for a ASR-9001 from both XR and ROMMON.
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9001#admin show diag chassis eeprom-info Rack 0 - ASR-9001 Chassis Controller Family : ef Controller Type : 400 PID : ASR-9001 rommon B1 > bpcookie bpcookie: Controller Family : ef Controller Type : 400 Product Number : ASR-9001
HTH,
Sam
04-09-2014 05:17 AM
Hi Elnur,
We are actually working on putting out a troubleshooting note on this.
Here are the details.
Problem Description:
When booting up an ASR9K in a, Nv Edge (cluster) environment the following error message may be displayed and the boot process aborted.
mbi_val_process_packet: received repsonse (rack 1) Received do not boot message: [min ver: 00.00] reason 6 Don't boot reason: Incompatible chassis types MBI Validation aborted
There are three scenarios where we may see this 'Incompatible chassis types' error message.
Scenario 1 and 2 ONLY apply to the ASR-9001-S while scenario 3 applies to any ASR9K chassis.
1.
In this scenario there are two 9001-S chassis which are being clustered.
If one 9001-S has been upgraded to 120G but the second 9001-S is only running 60G then the incompatible chassis types error message will be displayed when booting the second router.
In order to fix the incompatibility make sure that both routers are upgraded (120G) or not upgraded (60G).
The command show license log operational can be used to check if the license is active.
In this example the 120G license is not operational. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9001#show license log operational #ID :SDR :FeatureID :NodeID :Time: Log 15 :Owner :A9K-9001-120G-LIC:0/RSP0/CPU0:Wed Oct 16 05:44:35 2013: license_acquire: opaque_string (null), result('License Manager' detected the 'warning' condition 'Licensed feature does not exist') In this example the 120G license is operational RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9001#show license log operational #ID :SDR :FeatureID :NodeID :Time: Log 1 :Owner :A9K-9001-120G-LIC:0/RSP0/CPU0:Sat Mar 15 00:22:09 2014: license_acquire: opaque_string (null), result(No error)
2.
In this scenario there are two 9001-S chassis in a cluster and neither chassis has been upgraded to 120G (see scenario 1 for verification).
The cause of this issue is the IML variable being incorrectly set to 1 in ROMMON. This variable should ONLY be set to 1 once the chassis is upgraded to 120G.
To resolve this issue set the IML variable to 0.
rommon B1 > IML=0 rommon B2 > sync rommon B3 > boot
3.
In this scenario two dissimilar chassis types are in a cluster.
ASR9K nV Edge does not allow dissimmilar chassis to form a cluster. During bootup the system will check the chassis type for the purpose of clustering capabilities. Any dissimilar combination can hit this issue, such as 9010 to 9922 or 9001 to 9006.
In order to verify the chassis type use the command admin show diag chassis eeprom-info in XR or the bpcookie command in ROMMON.
The below example shows the output for a ASR-9001 from both XR and ROMMON.
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9001#admin show diag chassis eeprom-info Rack 0 - ASR-9001 Chassis Controller Family : ef Controller Type : 400 PID : ASR-9001 rommon B1 > bpcookie bpcookie: Controller Family : ef Controller Type : 400 Product Number : ASR-9001
HTH,
Sam
04-09-2014 05:51 AM
Hi Sam
It turns out it was IML in my case, appreciate your response!!!
Thank you
Cheers
Elnur
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide