Cisco Bug Discussions

When is this going to be fixed. It's pretty worthless having all of the pre-built rules in the Default policy set and having to rebuild them when creating another policy set.This is a huge step backwards from the previous policy GUI.

What are the actual steps to troubleshoot this issue or bug? User Access Verification(none) login: admin********************************************************************************Fabric discovery in progress, show commands are not fully function...

hi someone have a new process for fix for this bug?ISE 2.7 patch 2, license base+apex CSCvt67933 - ISE Feed Service Online Subscription Update is failing

This is starting to get ridiculous. It seems like there is a CDP/LLDP vulnerability at least once a year. Why doesn't Cisco take the time to sit down and write a secure LLDP/CDP library using bounds checking or something(or use SELinux/apparmor to li...

Hello, I would ask how I can simulate this bug? I just tested it in version 3.7(2) and I do not see the issue. I don't want to say, that bug is not visible in our system, just want to be sure, if I'm simulating the issue correctly, please be so kind ...

Im updating DCNM from 11.2.1 to 11.3.1 and got the error above at the beginning of the install. Im wondering if anyone has encountered this and if there is a workaround.

The BUG CSCux71386 information says that one of the versions it is fixed in is 3.7(4)E.Can someone tell me if the bug fix is also included in 3.7(5)E. Thanks 

Does this vulnerability exist in previous versions other than 12.x? 

You indicate this has been fixed in in 6.6.x but there is no 6.6.x available for download.  

SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.47.1.1.1.1.2.101000470 = STRING: "Fex-101 A/C,110/220v 200W"SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.47.1.1.1.1.2.101000471 = STRING: "Fex-101 A/C,110/220v 200W"SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.47.1.1.1.1.6.101000470 = INTEGER: 1SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.47.1.1.1.1.6.101000471 ...

Hi,I Have 2 switches stacked and one of them has the problem. I tried to reload it but the problem still there.Is there another solution to fix it? For information, I tried the poe with an access point and a phone.IOS XE : 16.9.2

Hi,  i have exactly the same problem like here : https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvn17436 (Chassis 2 R0/0: smand: 2/RP/0: Used Memory value 97% ) but running Version 17.3.1 which is meant in "known fixed released"...and as a bonus ant...

Two of the servers with below version are generating the same alerts.Error: ioctl call failed for PSU 2 1st serverBMC Alternate Image Version2.0(3f)BMC Version Infover: 3.0(4j) 2nd serverBMC Alternate Image Version2.0(3f)BMC Primary Image Version3.0(...

No resolved in Model : Cisco Firepower 2110 Threat Defense (77) Version 6.6.0 (Build 90). Unbelievable that this will prevent a SSL certificate install when there is a device behind the FW that is using port 4500.