Cisco Bug Discussions

The 2# link is not valid. Update the link below: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/aci/apic/sw/2-x/L2_config/b_Cisco_APIC_Layer_2_Configuration_Guide/b_Cisco_APIC_Layer_2_Configuration_Guide_chapter_0100.html#d2789e2075a1635 (...

Anyone else see this bug in 11.5.1.11001-34 since the Jakarta Patch?   - NOC

The RoomReady controller connects to the codec via SSH and polls the codec 1 time every 60 seconds. What is the suggested polling time? The RoomReady controller is connected to 500+ codecs around the world and the only time this issue is seen is when...

Where is the statistics for the DSL line connection at this model?   I can't find it in the GUI or the CLI

This problem has still not been fixed. The issues persist over multiple controllers (5508 & 5520) with different AP Models (2600,2700.2800). Only solution as of now is to MARK "bittorrent" traffic on the WLC - AVC - Profile section.   Is there any ot...

WARNING: No backup device is configured. This is required to recover your system in case of failure. What is the solution to fix this issue.

Hi,   Is that all 2.1 ISE is affected for all build number? We are currently use 2.1.0474 with patch 3, customer concern that this version is affected review vulnerability. 

Hi ,   Would like to check whether ISE 2.1.0474 patch 3 is affected on this bug / vulnerability?

It is important to note a Nexus 7000 could perform install pre-check without any warning/error even if this bug is present.Upon reboot, the system may not be able to mount/access the bootflash rendering the switch inoperable. I would recommend to any...

Anyone be hit with this Bug on CUCM version: 10.5.2.12901-1? Have a TAC case on this and trying to see if I have been affected. Just wondering if anyone had a work-around?

Is Cisco planning to patch the fetchaudio issue on 11.5 VVB?

Why has the bug CSCvf47808 been replaced by CSCvg42682? For CSCvf47808 there was already a fix in 8.3.130.0 and for CSCvg10793 there was a fix in 8.3.131.0. But now there is a 8.3.132.0 that fixes CSCvg42682. Why did something had to be fixed twice?

The job does not fail. The job finishes with no violation but it should finish with a violation