04-15-2014 04:13 PM - edited 03-14-2019 01:22 PM
Hello folks,
As you are aware Cisco officially stated that Device Targets are depreciated as of UCCE 9.0 and have recommended the use of Agent Targeting Rules as opposed to the legacy Device Target method.
I was wondering if there is any situation where we are still required to use Device Targets as opposed to Agent Targeting rules ?
I am about to test Mobile agent with Agent Targeting Rule in my Lab, but other than that I have seen pretty much everything else function as normal when using Agent Targeting Rules.
I will post my results on the Mobile agent with Agent Targeting Rules by this weekend, I am guessing there shouldnt be any issues.
In the meanwhile, let me know in your experience you have found any interesting scenarios where Device Targets are the only way to go. I also need to test Outbound Dialer and Target rules for those, if I end up configuring these in lab and testing it fast enough I will post the results, but feel free to pitch in your experience/ recommendations and so forth.
Thanks in Advance.
Sash
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-16-2014 06:28 AM
No, targeting rules have been available for a while and save you a tone of time. No need for dedicated device targets with labels. Mobile agent supports targeting rules.
Chris
04-16-2014 02:17 PM
ATRs are the best! I think they came in on 7.5x, I've not seen a device target in years and good riddance to them!
david
04-16-2014 06:28 AM
No, targeting rules have been available for a while and save you a tone of time. No need for dedicated device targets with labels. Mobile agent supports targeting rules.
Chris
04-20-2014 12:15 PM
Thanks for the feedback, thats what I thought and Yes you are correct, now that I think about it I have used Targeting rules in 8.5. Didn't realize it was out as far back as 7.5.
Once again thank you for your feedback.
04-16-2014 02:17 PM
ATRs are the best! I think they came in on 7.5x, I've not seen a device target in years and good riddance to them!
david
04-10-2024 12:05 PM
Hey All!
Does anyone have a robust how to guide on implementing ATRs. I have read the high level doc found here: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/icm_enterprise/icm_enterprise_12_0_1/Configuration/Guide/ucce_b_configuration-guide-for-unified-cce1201/ucce_b_configuration-guide-for-unified-cce1201_chapter_0111.html#U...
But I'm curious if anyone has a guide that outlines how to transition from DTs to ATRs...
04-10-2024 06:03 PM
Here's the troubleshooting guide from Cisco about it.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/contact-center/unified-contact-center-enterprise/214984-troubleshoot-agent-targeting-rules-in-ci.html
04-11-2024 08:39 AM
Hey Bill! Thanks for the link!
04-11-2024 06:09 AM
There is no guide AFAIK.
But the idea is not to have overlapping patterns in the DB for DT Vs ATR.
As a test try with a pool of DT, create a summary pattern in ATR, delete the matching DT. Test it, if it works, rinse and repeat.
For example,
DT - 1111111111, 1111111112, 1111111113
ATR - 11111111111.
HTH
Senthil
04-11-2024 08:38 AM
Got it, thanks Senthil!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide