07-22-2013 12:04 PM - edited 03-04-2019 08:31 PM
Hi All,
Will MACSec between two 3560X switches work across a Layer 2 WAN?
Sachin
07-23-2013 01:26 PM
According to what I understand or know, it is a Mac based security feature or standard. Data Link Layer of the OSI Model has 2 sub layers :
1) Logical Link Control(LLC).
2) Mac(media access control).
As it is a Mac based standard, it can support Layer 2 WAN.
Mac layer acts as an interface between Logical layer and the physical layer of the OSI model.
07-23-2013 04:38 PM
Thanks Fahad. From my understanding, MACSec operates on a hop-by-hop basis, so encryption is supposed to take place between hops and not over it, according to this document:
http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2013/ae-seaman-macsec-hops-0213-v02.pdf
I've come across something that indicates it works over EoMPLS:
http://www.networklabs.info/2013/04/cisco-macsec-over-junipercisco-mpls.html
But I wanted to know if anyone has actually done it. Also if it works with providers who use Q-in-Q.
Sachin
07-23-2013 07:49 PM
you are correct sganpat, it works on L3 interfaces.
02-17-2014 02:37 AM
Hello Sachin,
I'd like to ask whether the MACSec worked for you over the MPLS I guess you have used p2p PW right?
Thank you very much
adam
02-17-2014 05:55 AM
Hi Adam.
We didn't bother with it. We ended up going with 15Mb WAN links and using firewalls w/VPN at the edge instead. It came out cheaper and it works so far.
I'm sorry that I couldn't be of more help to you.
Sachin
06-11-2014 06:50 AM
I've seen MACSEC work over SDH and other carrier links. Oddly am seeing some issues with a Cisco only provider who is using qinq and they cannot get it to pass. The ethertypes 0x888e eapol and 0x88e5 MACSEC are critical in the negotiation.
06-26-2014 09:13 AM
I am also planning MACsec encryption for the DCI links. Since MACsec encryption on a hop-by-hop basis, DCI link should not expect to have ethernet encapsulation happening in the telco side (there could be exception with EoMPLS or some pseudowire tunnels).
The link I am planning is Unprotected wave (transparent layer1 service with optical encapsulation in carrier network).
Please let me know if any body have successfully implemented MACsec over long distance carrier network?
12-21-2015 10:42 AM
Have it implemented it across many WAN's. Had an issue with Cogent on a 7600 and they replaced a line-card and its online. Have deployed over carriers with SDH, DWDM and long-haul L2 circuits. At times you have to battle with carrier to ensure they support ethertypes 0x888e eapol and 0x88e5 macsec, would recommend you provide a minimum requirements list in contract so you can hold them to support it.
12-26-2017 03:43 AM
Hi,
Did you use Cisco swithes or routers for MACSec over DWDM? Did you see that MACSec works between two Cisco swithes over DWDM or EoMPLS?
02-10-2022 12:40 PM - edited 02-10-2022 12:49 PM
Used 3750, 6880's and 9500s. 9500's support MKA and now 6880's (SY7) do as well (standards based) so provide for migration path to MKA. 9500X will support only MKA and not CTS.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide