cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1037
Views
25
Helpful
7
Replies

NAT Cisco ISR

RS19
Level 4
Level 4

Attached is the diagram for reference.

Existing network setup is shown in blue color. I have L2 Switch -> L3 Swtich -> Gateway rotuer (ISR)

The Gateway router is connected to Internet.

Gateway Router:

Gi1/0 on LAN side which is configured for NAT inside

Gi0/0 is configured for NAT outside

NAT pool is configured to nat my LAN segment (10.10.10.0/24) -> Public IP Address pool in GWY router

This works fine.

 

I want to achieve the below. Planning to setup the devices in blue.

Want to do similar NAT for another network 192.168.100.0/24

Want to use another interface in Gateway router say Gi1/1 as NAT inside interface & use the same NAT pool.

 

NAT both 10.10.10.0/24 & 192.168.100.0/24 -> Public IP Address pool in GWY router

 

Let me know if this is possible.

Can i use 2 Interface as NAT inside & 1 NAT outside interface & use command NAT pool to NAT?

Let me know if this is possible ?

 

 

 

7 Replies 7

balaji.bandi
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

yes as long as routing in place, the NAT should work for you.

BB

***** Rate All Helpful Responses *****

How to Ask The Cisco Community for Help

Thanks, Yes routing will be available.

So I can have 2 NAT inside interface & 1 NAT outside interface and use common pool for NAT

yes you can have them as many as you want, make sure you add the new subnet in to Group to NAT.

 

BB

***** Rate All Helpful Responses *****

How to Ask The Cisco Community for Help

Hello


@RS19 wrote:

Thanks, Yes routing will be available.

So I can have 2 NAT inside interface & 1 NAT outside interface and use common pool for NAT


Yes you can
example:

access-list 10 remark inside_lan
access-list 10 permit 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 10 permit 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255


ip nat pool NAT 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.2 prefix-length 30
ip nat inside source list 10 pool NAT


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

Seb Rupik
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Hi there,

The short answer is yes. Depending on how you have implemented your NAT statement, either add a new route-map condition or a new ACE to the ACL referenced in the your NAT statement.

 

If you share your NAT configuration we can fill in the blanks.

 

cheers,

Seb.

Yes you can use 2 interface as for NAT inside.

 

Can somebody answer is there any limitation on number of NAT inside interace.

I recommend you to use NVI interface to avoid entering NAT inside command on all the interfaces. NVI is not a new way of doing NAT; it’s a new feature to resolve NAT restriction. Checkout below lik for the document.
Please do not hesitate to click the STAR button if you are satisfied with my answer.

Where is the link ?