06-28-2022 06:32 AM
I successfully stacked two C9500-48Y4C.
The Uplink (single 10/100/1000BaseTX SFP) works fine.
Then I tried to connect a C9200 with an LACP port-channel (Twe1/0/6 and Twe2/0/6).
But I only get:
%ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Twe2/0/6 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port.
To troubleshoot I now wanted to use a single connection without port-channel between the stack and the C9200.
Stack: interface TwentyFiveGigE2/0/6 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-1000 switchport mode trunk C9200: interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/4 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-1000 switchport mode trunk
The C9200 does receive packets (like cdp and vtp) from the stack.
But there are not packets incoming on the stack.
TwentyFiveGigE2/0/6 is up, line protocol is up (connected) Hardware is Twenty Five Gigabit Ethernet, address is 3c8b.7f00.d386 (bia 3c8b.7f00.d386) MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) Full-duplex, 10Gb/s, link type is auto, media type is SFP-10GBase-SR input flow-control is on, output flow-control is off ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:21:46 Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue: 0/40 (size/max) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 9000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts (0 multicasts) 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored 0 watchdog, 0 multicast, 0 pause input 0 input packets with dribble condition detected 14882 packets output, 1130522 bytes, 0 underruns Output 1300 broadcasts (0 multicasts) 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets 0 unknown protocol drops 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
I tried different SFP+-Modules and cables.
Any idea where the issue could be?
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-29-2022 05:55 AM
After some troubleshooting tipps ("self loop test") from the sales person, I found out the issue was not between sfp module and C9500, but C9200.
It was this bug.
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwa11962
Update C9200 from 17.03.04b to 17.3.5 solved the issue!
06-28-2022 07:21 AM
LACP port channel use channel-group mode active
stack - Cat 9500 SVL ?
06-28-2022 07:35 AM
I know.
I used channel-group mode active to create the Port-Channel.
show etherchennel summary showes "LACP" as Protocol.
But like I wrote, the issue seems to be deeper, even without port-channel.
show stackwise
Stackwise Virtual Configuration: -------------------------------- Stackwise Virtual : Enabled Domain Number : 1 Switch Stackwise Virtual Link Ports ------ ---------------------- ------ 1 1 HundredGigE1/0/51 HundredGigE1/0/52 2 1 HundredGigE2/0/51 HundredGigE2/0/52
Chassis Type: C9500-48Y4C Switch Number 1 Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. ---+-----+--------------------------------------+--------------+-------------- 1 52 Cisco Catalyst 9500 Series Router C9500-48Y4C FDO26XXXXXX Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status ---+--------------------------------+----+------------+------------------+-------- 1 xxxx.yyyy.D4C0 to xxxx.yyyy.D4F3 2.0 17.3.1r[FC2] 17.05.01 ok Mod Redundancy Role Operating Redundancy Mode Configured Redundancy Mode ---+-------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------- 1 Active sso sso Switch Number 2 Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. ---+-----+--------------------------------------+--------------+-------------- 1 52 Cisco Catalyst 9500 Series Router C9500-48Y4C FDO26XXXXXY Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status ---+--------------------------------+----+------------+------------------+-------- 1 xxxx.yyyy.D380 to xxxx.yyyy.D3B3 2.0 17.3.1r[FC2] 17.05.01 ok Mod Redundancy Role Operating Redundancy Mode Configured Redundancy Mode ---+-------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------- 1 Standby sso sso Chassis 1 MAC address range: 160 addresses from xxxx.yyyy.d4c0 to xxxx.yyyy.d55f Chassis 2 MAC address range: 160 addresses from xxxx.yyyy.d380 to xxxx.yyyy.d41f
06-28-2022 07:40 AM
this is more of SVL config, can you post
both the side :
show run interface port-channel X ( x is the value using ?)
show interface x/x
show etherchannel X summary
show interface port-channel x switchport
show version
06-28-2022 07:35 AM
interface TwentyFiveGigE2/0/6 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-1000 switchport mode trunk C9200: interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/4 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-1000 switchport mode trunk
Can you make sure the 2/0/6 is operating as 10Gig and not 25?
HTH
06-28-2022 08:12 AM
Like I said. I try to simplify the scenario and have not configured the port-channel anymore.
The Ports operate at 10G.
C9500 Stack
(I changed the port and hardware chassis in case 2/0/6 was defect)
Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type Twe1/0/21 connected trunk full 10G SFP-10GBase-SR
C9200
Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type Te1/1/4 connected trunk full 10G SFP-10GBase-SR
It kinda works now!
I found some threads (3 years old) about compatibility issues with third-party modules
But they should be fixed with newer IOS versions.
I just tried two original Cisco 1G modules and it works.
I already configured
service unsupported-transceiver no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid
Maybe an upgrade to 17.6.3 helps...
06-28-2022 08:22 AM
Yeah, Cisco devices don't always work with 3rd party vendor optics. I use one 3rd part vendor's optics that works pretty much with all Cisco devices. So, it's a kind of trial and error process.
HTH
06-28-2022 08:33 AM
But they should be compatible according to this:
(search for "11555/SFP-10GLR-31")
And the sales person asked me about my devices to verify they were compatible.
Maybe I have more luck tomorrow.
06-28-2022 10:15 AM
@Reza Sharifi mention that not all SFP compatible and even worse cisco not support TAC for 3-rd party SFP.
https://www.fiberlandtec.com/how-to-check-sfpmodule-optical-signal-strength.html
check this link see if the optical signal is strength is OK (this only one step to check SFP).
06-28-2022 08:28 AM
I understand, that is the reason i requeted interface output to see if the interface gone in error disable mode.
Thank you for the clarification.
06-28-2022 05:33 PM
@fhk-cwempe wrote:
Maybe an upgrade to 17.6.3 helps...
Use 17.3.5 instead.
NOTE: Currently suspended testing 17.6.3 because we have already found "0-config" bugs in two test switches.
06-29-2022 05:55 AM
After some troubleshooting tipps ("self loop test") from the sales person, I found out the issue was not between sfp module and C9500, but C9200.
It was this bug.
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwa11962
Update C9200 from 17.03.04b to 17.3.5 solved the issue!
06-29-2022 06:18 AM
Thanks alot friend for sharing solution.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide