HSRP and span issue
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-18-2013 01:28 AM - edited 03-07-2019 12:53 PM
Hi Guys- I have just come across some wired issue. I have two layer three switches say A and B and switch B connects to another switch say switch C. Switch A and B are running HSRP for vlan 1,101 and 103. Switch C is the voice switch and i am using a monitor session to span all the voice traffic to server connected to the same switch. when configure switch with command monitor session 1 source vlan 103 and mintor session destination int gi0/3 my entire network goes offline but when i use monitor session 1 source interface gi 0/6 - 46 it works all good. Below is the brief description of HSRP.
Switch A- interface vlan 1
ip add 192.168.0.251 255.255.255.0
standby ip 192.168.0.254
interface Vlan 101
ip add 192.168.1.251 255.255.255.0
standby ip 192.168.1.254
interface vlan 103
ip add 192.168.3.251 255.255.255.0
standby ip 192.168.3.254
Switch B- interface vlan 1
ip add 192.168.0.252 255.255.255.0
standby ip 192.168.0.254
interface Vlan 101
ip add 192.168.1.252255.255.255.0
standby ip 192.168.1.254
interface vlan 103
ip add 192.168.3.252 255.255.255.0
standby ip 192.168.3.254
switch C- interface vlan 103
ip add 192.168.3.253 255.255.255.0
ip default-dateway 192.168.3.254
So bascically when we configure the command monitor session 1 source vlan 103 on switch C network goes offline and we can see the following error in logs of swich A and B.
"HSRP-4-DIFFVIP1: Vlan 1 grp 0 active routers virtual ip address 192.168.3.254 is different to the locally configured address 192.168.0.254."
Switch B is in active mode for vlan 1,101 and 103 and switch A is in standby mode. Also if we change the command to monitor session 1 source interface gi 0/6 -46 network comes back online.
Please help me guys this issue is driving me nuts!!!!!
Thanks,
Lovedeep.
- Labels:
-
Other Switching

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-18-2013 06:38 AM
From the error message you've posted, it seems you are not assigning a standby 'group' for each SVI, and each HSRP IP is falling within the default group '0'. Is that correct, or did you just not post the rest of the HSRP configuration per interface?
-Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-18-2013 04:22 PM
Hi Chris,
Thank you for your reply. Yes i haven't assigned the group so bydefault they are falling in group 0.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-18-2013 05:45 PM
I don't suppose trying to resolve the error message by assigning a different group per SVI works?
What is significant about the configuration difference between G0/3 on Switch C and say G0/6-46?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-18-2013 05:50 PM
Basically on 0/3 have got recording server connected and 0/6 - 46 are used for connecting phones. As per my knowledge group number doesn't matter.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-18-2013 06:18 PM
Granted, it shouldn't matter, but your logs are barking about it. In a normal HSRP state, those messages are not seen. So, either there's a configuration issue somewhere, or perhaps some other condition that has not been revealed to this forum....or a bug. Without configs in front of me, and if changing groups doesn't help, then I'm left to improve my dart game.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-18-2013 09:07 PM
Hi
Is there a direct connection between A n B
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-18-2013 09:35 PM
Hi,
Sorry i forgot to mention that in my first post. Yes they are directly connected.
