01-27-2025 07:33 AM - edited 01-27-2025 08:25 AM
I'm in the process of replacing a number of access switches, and I'm trying to verify if I need to replace some 3850 stacks (2-3 switches, each) with 9300s or if 9200s would suffice. As I understand it, the biggest difference in this situation is the available stack bandwidth.
I wanted to see how much of this we are currently using, but the only way I currently know to look is "sh controllers util". Is there some other way? They are all showing "0" for this, which could be accurate, but I also want to make sure I'm not missing anything.
Here's what I get from one of the stacks, as an example:
Total Ports : 168
Total Ports Receive Bandwidth Percentage Utilization : 1
Total Ports Transmit Bandwidth Percentage Utilization : 1
Switch 1 Stack Ring Max Percentage Utilization : 0
Switch 2 Stack Ring Max Percentage Utilization : 0
Switch 3 Stack Ring Max Percentage Utilization : 0
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-27-2025 10:20 AM
Understood, although, laugh, with management, more often we need to justify the need to upgrade, not the converse.
Unsurprising ". . . say that we're barely touching the stack bandwidth." may be the case.
01-27-2025 07:47 AM
Check if below cmds help you.
show switch stack-ports detail
show switch stack-ports detail | i rate
show switch stack-ring speed
show switch stack-bandwidth
01-27-2025 08:27 AM
Those show me the capability but don't seem to provide utilization information:
Server-C3850-Stack#sh switch stack-ports ?
summary Show details of switch stack ports info
| Output modifiers
<cr>
Server-C3850-Stack#sh switch stack-ports
Switch# Port1 Port2
----------------------------
1 OK OK
2 OK OK
3 OK OK
Server-C3850-Stack#sh switch stack-ports sum
Sw#/Port# Port Status Neighbor Cable Length Link OK Link Active Sync OK #Changes to LinkOK In Loopback
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/1 OK 2 50cm Yes Yes Yes 1 No
1/2 OK 3 50cm Yes Yes Yes 1 No
2/1 OK 3 50cm Yes Yes Yes 1 No
2/2 OK 1 50cm Yes Yes Yes 1 No
3/1 OK 1 50cm Yes Yes Yes 1 No
3/2 OK 2 50cm Yes Yes Yes 1 No
Server-C3850-Stack#show switch stack-ring speed
Stack Ring Speed : 480G
Stack Ring Configuration: Full
Stack Ring Protocol : StackWise
Server-C3850-Stack#sh switch stack-bandwidth
Stack Current
Switch# Role Bandwidth State
------------------------------------------------------------
*1 Active 480G Ready
2 Standby 480G Ready
3 Member 480G Ready
01-27-2025 09:25 AM
As an aside, you would need a very, very busy dual or triple 3850 stack for stack ring bandwidth to be an issue.
01-27-2025 09:42 AM
Yeah, I'm trying to find some way to showing my leadership team that we didn't 3850s need at these locations, and so don't need a 9300 to replace them. Everything else is pretty straight-forward, I just want to make sure I'm not misrepresenting anything when I point at the output of "show controllers util" and say that we're barely touching the stack bandwidth.
01-27-2025 10:20 AM
Understood, although, laugh, with management, more often we need to justify the need to upgrade, not the converse.
Unsurprising ". . . say that we're barely touching the stack bandwidth." may be the case.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide