cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
550
Views
4
Helpful
5
Replies

Verify 3850 Stack Bandwidth Utilization

robo764
Level 1
Level 1

I'm in the process of replacing a number of access switches, and I'm trying to verify if I need to replace some 3850 stacks (2-3 switches, each) with 9300s or if 9200s would suffice.  As I understand it, the biggest difference in this situation is the available stack bandwidth.

I wanted to see how much of this we are currently using, but the only way I currently know to look is "sh controllers util".  Is there some other way?  They are all showing "0" for this, which could be accurate, but I also want to make sure I'm not missing anything. 

Here's what I get from one of the stacks, as an example:

Total Ports : 168
Total Ports Receive Bandwidth Percentage Utilization : 1
Total Ports Transmit Bandwidth Percentage Utilization : 1
Switch 1 Stack Ring Max Percentage Utilization : 0
Switch 2 Stack Ring Max Percentage Utilization : 0
Switch 3 Stack Ring Max Percentage Utilization : 0
1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Understood, although, laugh, with management, more often we need to justify the need to upgrade, not the converse.

Unsurprising ". . . say that we're barely touching the stack bandwidth." may be the case.

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5

Devaa
Spotlight
Spotlight

Check if below cmds help you.

show switch stack-ports detail
show switch stack-ports detail | i rate
show switch stack-ring speed
show switch stack-bandwidth

robo764
Level 1
Level 1

Those show me the capability but don't seem to provide utilization information:

Server-C3850-Stack#sh switch stack-ports ?
  summary  Show details of switch stack ports info
  |        Output modifiers
  <cr>

Server-C3850-Stack#sh switch stack-ports
Switch#   Port1     Port2
----------------------------
1         OK        OK
2         OK        OK
3         OK        OK

Server-C3850-Stack#sh switch stack-ports sum
Sw#/Port#  Port Status  Neighbor  Cable Length   Link OK   Link Active   Sync OK   #Changes to LinkOK  In Loopback
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/1        OK           2         50cm           Yes       Yes           Yes       1                   No
1/2        OK           3         50cm           Yes       Yes           Yes       1                   No
2/1        OK           3         50cm           Yes       Yes           Yes       1                   No
2/2        OK           1         50cm           Yes       Yes           Yes       1                   No
3/1        OK           1         50cm           Yes       Yes           Yes       1                   No
3/2        OK           2         50cm           Yes       Yes           Yes       1                   No
Server-C3850-Stack#show switch stack-ring speed

Stack Ring Speed        : 480G
Stack Ring Configuration: Full
Stack Ring Protocol     : StackWise
Server-C3850-Stack#sh switch stack-bandwidth
                   Stack       Current
Switch#   Role     Bandwidth   State
------------------------------------------------------------
*1       Active    480G        Ready
 2       Standby   480G        Ready
 3       Member    480G        Ready

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

As an aside, you would need a very, very busy dual or triple 3850 stack for stack ring bandwidth to be an issue.

Yeah, I'm trying to find some way to showing my leadership team that we didn't 3850s need at these locations, and so don't need a 9300 to replace them.  Everything else is pretty straight-forward, I just want to make sure I'm not misrepresenting anything when I point at the output of "show controllers util" and say that we're barely touching the stack bandwidth. 

Understood, although, laugh, with management, more often we need to justify the need to upgrade, not the converse.

Unsurprising ". . . say that we're barely touching the stack bandwidth." may be the case.