07-28-2017 03:57 PM - edited 03-19-2019 12:40 PM
Hi guys. We r switching over services from one site IM&P server to another site IM&P server as regular procedure every 6 month . I am having issue when I failed over from active IM&P (A server ) to Backup IM&P (B server) (from CUCM-Presence Redundancy Group Configuration-), after fail over status of them Idle (A)and Running in backup mode (B server) . B is primary now.
How to make status of both of them Normal and still keep B server as primary ? I tried to restart A server but still status not normal ... I attached picture.
Thank you
07-29-2017 12:33 PM
I believe you are confusing user assignments with the subcluster failover. A subcluster is active/active - both nodes are perfectly capable of having users assigned to it. This is separate from the failover and fallback procedures. If a cluster node fails either an administrator must initiate a fallback or the automatic fallback service parameter must be enabled (it's disabled by default since a fallback is disruptive to the users being moved back to their assigned node).
07-31-2017 06:02 AM
right now i have 300 users assigned on IM&P server A but active on server B. Can I move assignments of users to server B and keep them active on server B ?
07-31-2017 06:06 AM
Sure. You can reassign them under CUCM Admin > User Management > Assign Presence Users.
07-31-2017 06:10 AM
sorry looks like my mistake : I just noticed site A is publisher and site B is subscriber. Now I am thinking does it makes sense to do this ?
07-31-2017 06:22 AM
sorry looks like my mistake : I just noticed site A is publisher and site B is subscriber. Now I am thinking does it makes sense to do this ? What do u think Jonathan can i have users reloaded and assigned on Sub IM&P from PUB and active on it ?
08-01-2017 05:17 AM
I'm a little unclear what you're trying to accomplish here. If it's just a regularly scheduled restart the servers every six months because of an outdated Windows-centric, non-ECC memory SOP then just restart the IM&P node and fallback afterward either manually or automatically. Reassigning the users won't accomplish anything more than the failover and fallback would in that scenario.
Whether all users in a sub cluster are assigned to the same node or balanced between the two nodes is a simple decision of which is more important: WAN bandwidth or speed/blast radius of a failover. For example, if all of the users are assigned to the same node than the XMPP fabric does not need to forward IMs between IM&P cluster nodes. On the other hand, balancing the users between the two sub cluster nodes cuts the number of users that need to failover if a node fails in half. By the way, there is an Enterprise Parameter User Assignment Mode for Presence Server on IM&P Administration to set this behavior automatically when new users are synced in from LDAP.
08-01-2017 06:19 AM
it's not regularly scheduled restart the servers every six months , its regularly scheduled switch over the servers every six months between 2 sites. it's common thing when u have active/backup servers on different sites to test links,reach-ability, servers/apps.
I found out my site A is Pub and site B is Sub , so I think does it makes sense to fail over to site B IM&P ...
Another question is: will subscriber IM&P provide service If we loose PUB IM&P server ?
Thank you
08-02-2017 05:02 AM
will subscriber IM&P provide service If we loose PUB IM&P server ?
Yes, assuming it is in the same sub cluster as the publisher.
08-02-2017 06:48 AM
Yes, I think we have 1 cluster with distributed over IP WAN nodes.
I see with 10.5 version CUCM is a Pub for IM&P servers too, all servers added under Publisher. . Does it mean IM&P CUCM PUB keeps database of IM&P servers too ?
But I also see site A IM&P server as DBPub when I do "show network cluster", a little bit confusing.
Thank you
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide