Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I have an interesting situation I could use some help on. I have a route pattern "8" which just goes over a trunk to activate a paging system. This was working fine (dial 8 and receive tone back from the paging system) until a couple of days ago, w...
Hello All,A quick voice gateway design question. I have a 2811 currently acting as a WAN router for two remote sites. I have a 3750 switch stack, which is doing routing for my main site VLANS (about 10 vlans). Right now I have a routed link betwee...
Hello. I'm wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this issue. Customer's network is addressed as 192.168.1.x /24. They're using an ASA to Cisco VPN clients for remote access. The issue is that the office from which I work is also addressed as 19...
Hello,I have a Cisco 1841 router with (1) VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 card. I need to terminate 2 data T1s on this card and bond them with MLPPP. I just wanted to make sure this is possible with this card before I attempt this. Thanks for the help.
Something simple that I haven't been able to figure out.On the 7960/40 phone models, I used to be able to get into network settings, scroll down to option 33 and hit **# to allow me to erase the network settings. This would clear everything and grab...
Rebooted the pub. no change. this is very strange. There is nothing in the system that it should be trying to match, yet when I clear the urgent priority flag from the 8 route pattern it definately waits for the interdigit timeout. Is there anywh...
The issue with that is that I will still be using g711 intrasite---g729 will only be used between sites. Example: Phone/call in site A needs to connect to IVR in site A-should be no problem (all g711). But if Phone/call on Site A needs to go over t...
I had already seen that list. Unfortunately, there is no field notice for Sept. 2005, so this update is not included. It seems odd to me that, when this update came out in Sept. 2005, that there was no mention of it on cisco.com anywhere. It seems...
