09-28-2012 09:05 AM - edited 03-21-2019 06:21 AM
Hello Communty.
Customers UC540 goes down two times per week, he have this issue since 2 months. We didnt change anything on the UC.
I dont find anything about that error. Can you maye explain whats going on with that UC?
Is it a hardware failure ?
001117: Sep 28 14:19:37.936: %SYS-2-CHUNKBADREFCOUNT: Bad chunk reference count, chunk 88DF544C data 88E02088 refcount FFFFFFFF alloc pc 80D5410C. -Process= "CCSIP_SPI_CONTROL", ipl= 0, pid= 270, -Traceback= 0x801FEAECz 0x801C7EB8z 0x801CAF08z 0x8325F0A8z 0x80E70324z 0x80DAE268z 0x80D85578z 0x80D925A4z 0x80D93B84z 0x80E64C34z 0x80E6503Cz 0x801AFDC4z 0x801B2A88z
chunk_diagnose, code = 3
chunk name is MallocLite
current chunk header = 0x88E02078
data check, ptr = 0x88E02088
next chunk header = 0x88E020EC
data check, ptr = 0x88E020FC
previous chunk header = 0x88E02004
data check, ptr = 0x88E02014
Thanks in advance
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-23-2012 04:16 AM
Again as answered before. You need to update system software.
09-28-2012 10:24 AM
Software bug, update IOS.
09-28-2012 11:39 AM
Hi Patrick,
Please check if you have the following in your config:
no ip virtual-reassembly
or if you are missing the following command under your SVI, FastEthernet 0/0, Loopback and your Service engine interfaces :
ip virtual-reassembly in
HTH,
Alex
*Please rate helpful posts
10-03-2012 04:25 AM
Hi Alex.
I checked the config and its in :
interface Loopback0
ip virtual-reassembly
interface Integrated-Service-Engine0/0
ip virtual-reassembly
interface BVI1
ip virtual-reassembly
interface BVI100
ip virtual-reassembly
But its just "ip virtual-reassembly" not "ip virtual-reassembly in" as you wrote.
10-04-2012 12:31 PM
Hi Patrick,
if not this is not set under FastEthernet 0/0 this is happening. Do you have it there?
You should have it there.
Best regards,
Alex
10-05-2012 08:42 AM
Ok I did it on the Fa0/0 too.
But there is nothing special on the Fa0/0:
interface FastEthernet0/0
no ip address
ip virtual-reassembly
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
Whats about the other Fa ports? Should i do the "ip virtual-reassembly" on all interfaces ?
Thanks for your help
10-07-2012 11:04 PM
Hi Patrick,
I saw that this could also be due to some SIP processing error. Please log a case with the SBSC for faster resolution.
Best regards,
Alex
10-23-2012 02:30 AM
There isn't any support contract on that UC. But i have some new information about that case. The UC crashes everytime when a employee of the headquarter forwards a call to this branch office with the faulty UC.
This is the Dial-Peer and trans-rules from the headquarter to the branch office:
dial-peer voice 240 voip
description Nummern in Chur
translation-profile incoming intersite
destination-pattern 4.
redirect ip2ip
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:192.168.23.41
incoming called-number 99[2-3].
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
codec g711alaw
no vad
voice translation-profile intersite
translate called 9900
!
voice translation-rule 9900
rule 1 /^99/ //
This is the Dial-Peer and trans-rules from the branch office to the headquarter
:
dial-peer voice 220 voip
description Nummern in Uster
translation-profile incoming intersite
destination-pattern [2-3].
redirect ip2ip
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:192.168.20.15
incoming called-number 994.
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
codec g711alaw
no vad
voice translation-rule 9900
rule 1 /^99/ //
!
voice translation-profile intersite
translate called 9900
10-23-2012 04:16 AM
Again as answered before. You need to update system software.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide