VPN

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Cisco CyberSecurity

Labels

Forum Posts

Hi, We have created the second IPSEC over L2TP tunnel on one of routers. When we connect first tunnel it worked fine but when we are connecting with this new tunnel it is showing below mentioned error. *Oct 8 10:04:31: %IP_VFR-7-FEATURE_DISABLE_IN: V...

usmansa1 by Level 1
  • 675 Views
  • 0 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I have enabled Smart Card authentication/authorization for remote VPN users. Everything is working well, however, because I have to use the "user Principal Name" of the authentication certificate on the card, which is a number, this is what shows up ...

slapier77 by Level 1
  • 587 Views
  • 0 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi All, Setup anyconnect client vpn  using command "sysopt connection permit-vpn" where it basically bypass interface access list for inbound vpn session. As per my knowledge and some documentation on cisco community or cisco configuration guide we n...

Hello.I have short and a bit odd question.This profile is for DMVPN. Do this profile would work? crypto ikev2 profile som_profile_name....pki trustpoint TPOINT-1pki trustpoint TPOINT-2....exit This router have 2 trust points from different PKI server...

vivaadmin by Level 1
  • 720 Views
  • 0 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi all, Below in the configuration in ASA0, still unable to ping to outside interface gi/2, pls help interface GigabitEthernet1/1nameif insidesecurity-level 0ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0!interface GigabitEthernet1/2nameif outsidesecurity-leve...

Good day. I have problem in installing IPsec VPN between Cisco ASA-5515 and mikrotik 951. I want to use ikev1 only. Here it is my network: LAN 10.7.0.1/24 --> Mikrotik <-- WAN 2.2.2.2 <--INTERNET--> WAN 1.1.1.1 --> Cisco <-- LAN 10.6.0.254/24 Config ...

falangerr by Level 1
  • 11081 Views
  • 30 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Having difficulties bringing up Site to Site Tunnel deployed to AWS using Cisco CSR. Permit inbound TCP 22, UDP 500, and UDP 4500 (with source IP's defined to restrict who/what can hit the appliance). The core issue is that phase 1 doesn't appear to ...

jcr520 by Level 1
  • 2172 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes
Top Solution Authors